Re: [Sip-implementors] Codec Negotiation issue

Please have a look to RFC 4317 and Section 2 Regards, Asim Sulaiman From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] on behalf of Rakesh [rak...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 12:34 PM To

Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP Payload Format

You can control silence suppression support for G729 codec using this parameter. Please refer RFC 4856 Section 2.1.9 Regrads, Asim Sulaiman -Original Message- From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mailto:sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of bidhu

Re: [Sip-implementors] Processing of Standalone 200 OK response for INVITE ["200OK received by UA with different Call-id which is not in context"]

Dear Prakash, I guess you will get 481 transaction does not exist. Regards, Asim Sulaiman -Original Message- From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mailto:sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Prakash K Sent: Monday, July 31, 2017 7:27 PM To: sip