Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP Soft Phone with IPSec Support

2011-01-05 Thread Bossiel thioriguel
Here is a brief description on how IPSec sec-agree is used in IMS: http://betelco.blogspot.com/2008/09/ipsec-using-security-agreement-in-3gpp.html --- En date de : Mer 5.1.11, Olle E. Johansson a écrit : De: Olle E. Johansson Objet: Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP Soft Phone with IPSec Support À: "

[Sip-implementors] Re : any SIP soft-phone supported with MSRP??

2011-01-04 Thread Bossiel thioriguel
For Android: http://code.google.com/p/imsdroid/ For Windows: http://code.google.com/p/boghe/ --- En date de : Mar 4.1.11, voice freak a écrit : De: voice freak Objet: [Sip-implementors] any SIP soft-phone supported with MSRP?? À: Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Date: Mardi 4 janvier 2011

Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP Stacks

2010-10-05 Thread Bossiel thioriguel
Hi, You can also try doubango (http://doubango.org/). Android demo project: http://code.google.com/p/imsdroid/ iOS demo project: http://code.google.com/p/idoubs/ Regards, --- En date de : Mer 20.5.09, Mike Coffee a écrit : De: Mike Coffee Objet: Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP Stacks À: "Iñaki Ba

Re: [Sip-implementors] Open Source SIP stack

2010-10-05 Thread Bossiel thioriguel
Hi, You can also try doubango (http://doubango.org/). Android demo project: http://code.google.com/p/imsdroid/ iOS demo project: http://code.google.com/p/idoubs/ Regards, --- En date de : Mar 13.7.10, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu a écrit : De: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu Objet: Re: [Sip-implementors] Open So

Re: [Sip-implementors] Re : Does SIP/SDP allow one-way RTP?

2010-03-19 Thread Bossiel thioriguel
, Iñaki Baz Castillo a écrit : De: Iñaki Baz Castillo Objet: Re: Re : [Sip-implementors] Does SIP/SDP allow one-way RTP? À: "Bossiel thioriguel" Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Date: Vendredi 19 mars 2010, 2h54 2010/3/19 Bossiel thioriguel > > Alice MUST add the

[Sip-implementors] Re : Does SIP/SDP allow one-way RTP?

2010-03-18 Thread Bossiel thioriguel
Alice MUST add the new "m=video" line below the old "m=" lines in the new Offer (The order is important). Bob should accept the Offer by sending a SDP response containing a "m=video" line with a port number equal to zero. References: RFC 3264 subclause 6 (for the answer with port =zero) and RFC 3

Re: [Sip-implementors] Query on qvalue in SIP headers

2010-03-18 Thread Bossiel thioriguel
The ABNF you provided is equivalent to: ( "0" ( "." DIGIT{,3} )? ) | ( "1" ( "." "0"{,3} )? ) and this mean that both "q=0." and "q=1."  OK. --- En date de : Jeu 18.3.10, Brett Tate a écrit : De: Brett Tate Objet: Re: [Sip-implementors] Query on qvalue in SIP headers À: "Brez Borland" , "prash

Re: [Sip-implementors] Re : does sips imply TLS (and TLS alone)?

2010-03-18 Thread Bossiel thioriguel
--- En date de : Jeu 18.3.10, Attila Sipos a écrit : De: Attila Sipos Objet: RE: Re : [Sip-implementors] does sips imply TLS (and TLS alone)? À: "Bossiel thioriguel" , sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Date: Jeudi 18 mars 2010, 11h54 thanks for your response   >>Ne

[Sip-implementors] Re : does sips imply TLS (and TLS alone)?

2010-03-18 Thread Bossiel thioriguel
Neither "transport=tls" nor "sips:" are mandatory when using SIP over TLS connection. As per RFC 5630 subclause 3.1.3: Because a SIPS URI implies that requests sent to the resource    identified by it be sent over each SIP hop over TLS, SIPS URIs are    not suitable for "best-effort TLS": they ar

Re: [Sip-implementors] Any "standarized" subset of 'pres-rules' document (RFC 5025) ?

2009-07-24 Thread Bossiel thioriguel
what are you trying to achieve? --- En date de : Ven 24.7.09, Iñaki Baz Castillo a écrit : De: Iñaki Baz Castillo Objet: Re: [Sip-implementors] Any "standarized" subset of 'pres-rules' document (RFC 5025) ? À: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Date: Vendredi 24 Juillet 2009, 12h24 El Vie

Re: [Sip-implementors] Any "standarized" subset of 'pres-rules'document (RFC 5025) ?

2009-07-24 Thread Bossiel thioriguel
date de : Ven 24.7.09, Avasarala Ranjit-A20990 a écrit : De: Avasarala Ranjit-A20990 Objet: RE: [Sip-implementors] Any "standarized" subset of 'pres-rules'document (RFC 5025) ? À: "Bossiel thioriguel" , sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu, "Iñaki Baz Castil

Re: [Sip-implementors] Any "standarized" subset of 'pres-rules' document (RFC 5025) ?

2009-07-24 Thread Bossiel thioriguel
nt (RFC 5025) ? À: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Date: Vendredi 24 Juillet 2009, 11h38 El Viernes, 24 de Julio de 2009, Bossiel thioriguel escribió: > Hi, > > You are right but there there are some implementation guidelines. > The main goal of these specifications is to

[Sip-implementors] Re : Any "standarized" subset of 'pres-rules' document (RFC 5025) ?

2009-07-24 Thread Bossiel thioriguel
Hi, You are right but there there are some implementation guidelines. The main goal of these specifications is to ease interoperability. For example : RCS clients are based on [OMA-WP-XDM_1_1_Implementation_Guidelines-20081209-A] (among others) which explain how your XCAP documents MUST be stru

[Sip-implementors] LGPLv3 SigComp API

2009-07-19 Thread Bossiel thioriguel
Hi all, Hi have released the first beta version of libSigComp an open source SigComp API. This API can be easily integrated in existing SIP/IMS stacks (UE, P-CSCF, PoC ...) without major changes. home page: http://code.google.com/p/libsigcomp/ implemented: RFC3320, RFC3485, RFC4077, RFC4464, R

[Sip-implementors] Re : SIP Text Message

2009-07-19 Thread Bossiel thioriguel
Try xlite --- En date de : Dim 19.7.09, Pete Kay a écrit : De: Pete Kay Objet: [Sip-implementors] SIP Text Message À: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Date: Dimanche 19 Juillet 2009, 10h08 Hi, I am trying to test out SiP MESSAGE, but I am not able to use SIPP to generate SIP MESSAGE mes

Re: [Sip-implementors] XCAP compression

2009-07-10 Thread Bossiel thioriguel
I have never seen such specifications. But If you want to compress your xcap data I think you should use SigComp (gzip, deflate, lz77 ... for compression and UDVM for decompression).An Open-Source SigComp Framework (LGPL) --> http://code.google.com/p/libsigcomp/ --- En date de : Ven 10.7.09, I

Re: [Sip-implementors] XCAP, avatars and so

2009-07-10 Thread Bossiel thioriguel
Here is an elegant way to store avatars (used in GSMA RCS) using XCAP --> http://www.openmobilealliance.org/technical/release_program/docs/CopyrightClick.aspx?pck=PresenceSIMPLE&file=V2_0-20081223-C/OMA-TS-Presence_SIMPLE_Content_XDM-V1_0-20081223-C.pdf known as [OMA Presence SIMPLE Content]. ---

[Sip-implementors] MSRP client ports biding

2008-12-12 Thread Bossiel thioriguel
Hi all, I have a question about MSRP client ports binding. I have two clients used in the IMS context (SIP signaling before setting up MSRP connections). The first client(UE1) send an INVITE to the second client(UE2). a)The UE1 request(SIP INVITE) contains a port number (both in media line and

[Sip-implementors] Re : SIP Service-Route Header

2008-11-07 Thread Bossiel thioriguel
Hi, Here you can find good article about service routes in IMS context --> http://betelco.blogspot.com/2008/11/proxy-and-service-route-discovery-in.html You can download an IMS Client and make traces to understand how this feature is used (try Mercuro IMS Client or OpenIC). --- En date de : Ven

Re: [Sip-implementors] Client for MSRP wanted

2008-09-26 Thread Bossiel thioriguel
P sdp do not react to 407s, XCAP documents cannot be saved properly, no visible support for MSRP relay. Regards,Adrian On Sep 17, 2008, at 2:47 PM, Bossiel thioriguel wrote: Last month we have discovered a new IMS client that fully support MSRP for instant messaging (RFC 4875). It&#x

Re: [Sip-implementors] Asking a user permission for presence subscription

2008-09-26 Thread Bossiel thioriguel
Mercuro IMS Client also implement XCAP. Mercuro IMS Client is fully compliant with main OMA specifications like: Capabilities query (xcap-caps) RLS Service (rls-services) Resource List (resource-lists) IETF Presence Rules (pres-rules) OMA Presence Rules (org.openmobilealliance.pres-rules) OMA XCAP

[Sip-implementors] Client for MSRP wanted

2008-09-17 Thread Bossiel thioriguel
Last month we have discovered a new IMS client that fully support MSRP for instant messaging (RFC 4875). It's name is Mercuro IMS Client ___ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucs