Re: [Sip-implementors] [dispatch] Proposal for a mew SIP 4xx Error code

Hi, I assume this discussion can be moved to SIPCORE, because I don't think DISPATCH needs to discuss the need for a new SIP response code, and where the work defining such would be done. Regards, Christer From: dispatch on behalf of Ranjit Avasarala Se

Re: [Sip-implementors] Fwd: ue-addr parameter in SIP Contact header

ether the GRUU has impacts on the ue-addr parameter you would have to ask the S-CSCF vendor, because there is no standard that defines the procedures for ue-addr. Regards, Christer On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 4:28 AM Christer Holmberg <mailto:christer.holmb...@ericsson.com> wrote: Hi,   Si

Re: [Sip-implementors] Fwd: ue-addr parameter in SIP Contact header

a.edu" , Christer Holmberg , "pkyzi...@alum.mit.edu" Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Fwd: ue-addr parameter in SIP Contact header Hi Philip Yes, I agree that connection and relation to UE are maintained by P-CSCF and S-CSCF does not need them. But in some call scenarios, th

Re: [Sip-implementors] [sipcore] SIP-URI Without Userinfo

Hi, >According to the rfc3261, the userinfo in the sip-uri is optional. >If there is no userinfo part then there should not be any "@" sign as well in >the sip-uri. Correct. >I have couple of questions > >1) If I am receiving a sip request without userinfo part in the sip-usri, >starting with

Re: [Sip-implementors] [Sip] Warning header

Hi, Per section 20.43 of RFC 3261, 306 seems like a good value. "306 Attribute not understood: One or more of the media attributes in the session description are not supported." Note that it is not a SIP response code, but a code supposed to give additional information about the respon

Re: [Sip-implementors] [Sipping] how to response the offer

Hi, I think A can answer however he wants. However, by using the SDP o- line one can explicitly indicate that nothing has changed from the previous SDP, so normally I guess the answer then wouldn't be modified either. Regards, Christer From: sip

[Sip-implementors] VS: Realiability and supported header

Hi, >I have a scenario. > > >-->(INVITE with Supported: 100 rel) ><--(1xx with Supported: 100 rel) > >If both the end points just say supported for 100 rel, then should we enable >reliablity for 1xx, i mean do we need to send PRACK for 1xx..? [C

Re: [Sip-implementors] [Sip] URI for Emergency call?

Look at 24.229, version 7.9.0. Regards, Christer From: Rathod Subhashchandra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10. lokakuuta 2007 10:47 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: [Sip] URI

Re: [Sip-implementors] RE-INVITE Problem [packet capture inside]

Hi, >>> complete treatment, see >>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sipping-sip-offeranswer-02.txt >> where you write in 4.2.5. Subsequent Offers and Answers: >> >> o In the o-line, only the version number may change, and if it >> changes it must increment by one from t

Re: [Sip-implementors] Regarding IMS queries

Why would you send IMS queries to SIMPLE??? Regards, Christer > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Gaurav Kheterpal > Sent: 21. kesäkuuta 2007 8:30 > To: 'venkatesh chandran'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Reg

Re: [Sip-implementors] Regarding ICE

I guess you should ask on the MMUSIC list. Regards, Christer > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Revathi Veluchamy > Sent: 19. kesäkuuta 2007 12:54 > To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu > Subject: [Sip-implementors] Regardi

Re: [Sip-implementors] Can B2BUA add record-route?

Yes, it can. Regards, Christer > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Tang Xi > Sent: 8. kesäkuuta 2007 21:04 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Sip-implementors] Can B2BUA add record-route? > > Hi All, Can B2BUA add record-route?