Re: [Sip-implementors] Early dialog forking

2010-09-02 Thread Eduardo Martins
Thanks all. -- Eduardo -:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:- http://emmartins.blogspot.com http://www.redhat.com/solutions/telco On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 12:15 AM, IƱaki Baz Castillo wrote: > 2010/9/2 Paul Kyzivat : >> (a) is the correct answer. >> >> You *may* need to send requ

[Sip-implementors] Early dialog forking

2010-09-02 Thread Eduardo Martins
Hello, trying to clarify thoughts with early dialog forking, generally is there such concept? For instance when receiving two 180s with different tags, should: a) 2 early dialogs be "constructed" (why? is there any need to a REQUEST to be sent before receiving 2xx response which needs the tags?)

[Sip-implementors] SIP SUBSCRIBE and PUBLISH Request URI Question

2010-03-04 Thread Eduardo Martins
Hi all, does anyone knows if there is a spec or extension from IETF, OMA or 3GPP, which defines that the SUBSCRIBE or PUBLISH Request URI with and without a port points to the same resource, that is, the URI canonized and without port? I've looked at IETF SIP, SUBSCRIBE and PUBLISH related RFCs and

[Sip-implementors] Mobicents JAIN SLEE 2.0.0.GA SIP AS released!

2010-02-25 Thread Eduardo Martins
Hi all, just letting all know that the first final and production quality second generation Mobicents JAIN SLEE platform is released. Mobicents JAIN SLEE 2.0.0.GA is the first and only open source JAIN SLEE 1.1 compliant application server, the Java standard for a telco SLEE, and which can be used

Re: [Sip-implementors] XCAP: Why "org.openmobilealliance.pres-rules" instead of just "pres-rules"?

2009-06-17 Thread Eduardo Martins
If there is a group that has been working on making XCAP useful for everyone it is OMA for sure, with the XDM specification, not IETF or even 3GPP, which I think is the big issue of almost none adoption in SIP clients. Btw, I wonder what is the problem with a auid name, that actually follows the X

Re: [Sip-implementors] Does e-tag change in publication refresh ?

2008-12-19 Thread Eduardo Martins
If you're refering to RFC 3903 then section 4.3 says it changes. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3903#section-4.3 -- Eduardo On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Pascal Maugeri wrote: > Hi > > Reading the RFC 3909 regarding how is updated the e-tag value I'd like to > know whether the e-tag is chang

Re: [Sip-implementors] Doubt on RLS response to an "eventual" resource list SUBSCRIBE

2008-12-18 Thread Eduardo Martins
where PS and RLS fucntions are implemented the UA may be targeting only a normal resource where those header values are not required. -- Eduardo On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Dale Worley wrote: > On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 15:35 +0000, Eduardo Martins wrote: > > my understanding of the RLS

[Sip-implementors] Doubt on RLS response to an "eventual" resource list SUBSCRIBE

2008-12-17 Thread Eduardo Martins
Hi all, I'm currently implementing an RLS where rls-services docs are in an XDM Server, and the global XDM rls-services doc is not cached in RLS. My doubt is what should be the response for the SUBSCRIBE when the RLS doesn't know if the R-URI points to an RL or not (such as the scenario where the P