Re: [Sip-implementors] Multiple redirect responses in single transaction

2010-02-17 Thread Mark R Lindsey
On Feb 17, 2010, at 9:50 PM, Aaron Clauson wrote: I have a scenario where I want a SIP client to be able to generate multiple redirect responses. The redirect responses will be generated based on user actions and will have a variable delay between them. You're going to have to clarify

Re: [Sip-implementors] Provision response with require header

2010-02-06 Thread Mark R Lindsey
On Feb 6, 2010, at 10:03 PM, Dale Worley wrote: On Sat, 2010-02-06 at 21:43 +0530, Rohit Aggarwal wrote: RFC 3261 also says that although Require is an optional header, it must not be ignored if present. In that case, it may be better option to cancel the request. IMO canceling the

Re: [Sip-implementors] Changing SSRC during Call

2009-07-16 Thread Mark R Lindsey
___ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors Mark R Lindsey lind...@e-c-group.com +12293160013 http://e-c-group.com/~lindsey

Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP UDP timeout with multiple proxies

2009-07-08 Thread Mark R Lindsey
://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors Mark R Lindsey lind...@e-c-group.com +12293160013 http://e-c-group.com/~lindsey ___ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu

Re: [Sip-implementors] Query in Request URI

2009-06-22 Thread Mark R Lindsey
The example sip:alice;day=tues...@atlanta.com appears in RFC 3261, section 19.1.3, with this note: The last sample URI above has a user field value of alice;day=tuesday. The escaping rules defined above allow a semicolon to appear unescaped in this field. For the purposes of this