[Sip-implementors] RFC 6337, Section 5.3. Hold and Resume of Media

2018-07-10 Thread Parveen Aggarwal
Hi Experts, I have below scenario 1. A Calls B with "sendrecv" 2. B holds call with "sendonly" 3. A holds call with "inactive"-- both A and B media direction is " *inactive" *now Now, If B receives re-invite without SDP what should be media direction attribute value "*sendonly"* or *"inactiv

[Sip-implementors] Media Port change during Hold/resume

2018-06-08 Thread Parveen Aggarwal
Dear Experts, I am facing one scenario: 1. Make video call: Audio and video port non-zero 2. downgrade video call: audio port non-zero and video port 0 3. Network hold the call: audio:sendonly , video port 0 4. network sending re-invite without SDP, User agent sending offer in 200 OK but with vid

Re: [Sip-implementors] Sending deRegister request just after sending REGISTER request

2017-06-27 Thread Parveen Aggarwal
ive registration, so end up with 4xx > response. > > Regards > Srinivas > > -Original Message- > From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mailto: > sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Parveen > Aggarwal > Sent: We

[Sip-implementors] Sending deRegister request just after sending REGISTER request

2017-06-27 Thread Parveen Aggarwal
Dear Expert, Is it valid to send deRegister request i.e. REGISTER with expires=0 before receiving final response for previous registration request i.e. REGISTER with expires >0 ? As per RFC 3261, It is mentioned for new REGISTER request only UAs MUST NOT send a new registration (that is, contai