[Sip-implementors] What is the SIP RFC for pay phone

2016-10-06 Thread Ramesh Babu Kuppili
Hello SIPers, What is the most prevalently used SIP RFC to implement pay phone. I am mainly looking for RFC that specify how to implement answer supervision and pulse metering. Thanks a lot for your time. - ramesh ___ Sip-implementors mailing

Re: [Sip-implementors] Codec negotiation when incoming re-INVITE has no SDP

2016-01-19 Thread Ramesh Babu Kuppili
a particular codec within that media stream MUST NOT change for the duration of a session" so you can leave out 101 our put in like 97 referring to the same codec as 101 did previously but you cannot reassign 101 to another one My two cents, Harry Am 18.01.2016 um 21:06 schrieb Rames

[Sip-implementors] Codec negotiation when incoming re-INVITE has no SDP

2016-01-18 Thread Ramesh Babu Kuppili
Hello SIP experts, I have a question about codec negotiation when a UA receives re-INVITE with no SDP. Lets say, the codec negotiation between UA and Proxy ended up with G711 and RFC 2833 (m=audio 60146 RTP/AVP 0 101). However after the call gets established, if the proxy sends re-INVITE

[Sip-implementors] Is this valid : "m=image 30032 udptl 0"

2015-11-14 Thread Ramesh Babu Kuppili
Hello SIP experts, Is the following media description in SDP valid: m=image 30032 udptl 0 I tried to figure out what is a valid "media format" for "media type" image. The closest I can get to for an answer is in RFC 6466. But even this RFC does not explicitly specify what the valid media

[Sip-implementors] RFC for implementing Emergency call handling in SIP

2014-04-03 Thread Ramesh Babu Kuppili
Hi SIP Gurus, I would like to know if there are any RFCs that deal with emergency call handling in SIP. I have been referred to http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-schulzrinne-sipping-emergency-arch-02. But this is a draft. Has this been made into RFC. If so, please provide me with the RFC

[Sip-implementors] change in tag field in To header

2013-02-26 Thread Ramesh Babu Kuppili
Hello, I am having a problem with the To tag in the incoming 603 Declined from UAS. 1. Outgoing INVITE - no tag in the To header. 2. Incoming 183 Session Progress - To tag - tag=h7g4Esbg_p65547t1361882364m374065c90075s1_4069438959-13. Incoming 603 Declined - To tag -

Re: [Sip-implementors] change in tag field in To header

2013-02-26 Thread Ramesh Babu Kuppili
] On Behalf Of Paul Kyzivat Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 3:50 AM To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] change in tag field in To header On 2/27/13 12:38 AM, Ramesh Babu Kuppili wrote: Hello, I am having a problem with the To tag in the incoming 603 Declined

Re: [Sip-implementors] change in tag field in To header

2013-02-26 Thread Ramesh Babu Kuppili
...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mailto:sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Ramesh Babu Kuppili Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 10:51 AM To: Paul Kyzivat; sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] change in tag field in To header Paul, Thanks for the response

[Sip-implementors] How to detect UA calling itself

2011-09-24 Thread Ramesh Babu Kuppili
Hello, We have a analog to SIP gateway that collects digits dialed from POTS lines and initiates the SIP call by sending INVITE to a proxy server. How can a user agent detect that it is calling itself in SIP? Either from incoming INVITE or from a INVITE response? We have to implement a

[Sip-implementors] Which RFCs to use to implement SIP based pay phones

2011-08-15 Thread Ramesh Babu Kuppili
Hello, Does anyone know which RFC to use to implement SIP based pay phones? - ramesh ___ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

[Sip-implementors] sip pay phone

2011-08-11 Thread Ramesh Babu Kuppili
Hello Mahesh, Did you get answer to your question about SIP pay phone. I am trying to implement SIP based payphones. Did you get the information you were looking for. Would you mind sharing the info with me. - ramesh ___ Sip-implementors mailing