Re: [Sip-implementors] re-Invite after 488

2018-02-09 Thread Ren Xin
Hi Alexey, Yes, you are right. The session should be kept with G711a unless there is a bug in your system. Best regards, Xin On Fri, 9 Feb 2018 at 11:19, Alexey wrote: > Good morning. > I have an issue for following call flow : > MGC 8 -> pjsip > > INVITE > > < OK > >ACK > ...establish

Re: [Sip-implementors] What does identical mean?

2015-05-26 Thread Ren Xin
x27;s reply before writing my own that says the > same thing. > > Thanks, > Paul > > On 5/26/15 7:07 AM, Dale R. Worley wrote: > >> Ren Xin writes: >> >>> Our product actually compare the newly received SDP with previous one and >>>

Re: [Sip-implementors] What does identical mean?

2015-05-26 Thread Ren Xin
on if this is a bug. On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote: > On 5/25/15 6:45 AM, Ren Xin wrote: > >> Hey, >> >> >> >> According to RFC 3264 par.7 >> >> "If the version in the origin >> >>line does not increment

[Sip-implementors] What does identical mean?

2015-05-25 Thread Ren Xin
Hey, According to RFC 3264 par.7 "If the version in the origin line does not increment, the SDP MUST be identical to the SDP with that version number. The answerer MUST be prepared to receive an offer that contains SDP with a version that has not changed; this is effectively a no-o