if possible any reference.
Thanks & Regards,
Sachin Rastogi
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
Hi Isshed,
As per rfc 4028,
"Session Refresh Request: An INVITE or UPDATE request processed
according to the rules of this specification. If the request
generates a 2xx response, the session expiration is increased to
the ***current time plus the session interval*** obtained fro
ia** like above
with CRLFs ? Please share any usecase scenario.
Thanks & Regards,
Sachin Rastogi
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Brett Tate wrote:
> > Is the below message correct or not?
>
> Yes. HCOLON and SLASH accommodate the atypical useless line wrapping and
> tabs
x08 ] valueLen=[20] value=[0x5b 0x29 0xe9 0x54
0x76 0x04 0x7d 0x56 0x9d 0xb2 0x31 0x95 0x97 0x1e 0xe0 0x3d 0x90 0x48 0x17
0x52 ] padding=[0]
FINGERPRINT=[0x80 0x28 ] valueLen=[4] value=[0x58 0x47 0xcf 0xd8 ]
padding=[0]
]
Thanks & Regards
Sachin Rastogi
_
Brett,
Thanks for reply. I have exactly the same scenario which you have explained.
For 'Contact', transport parameter can be different as it for future
requests,
but for 'Route' header, "sachinr.com" in my case, where I am sending Invite
to "sachinr.com" on TCP but mentioning "transport=udp" in
d with default proxy, then what will be the use
case scenario to add this proxy address in route header?
Thanks & Regards,
Sachin Rastogi
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
Hi Meir Leshem,
Please find my understanding for your questions under * *tag.
Please correct my understanding if anyone think otherwise.
Best Regards
Sachin Rastogi
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Meir Leshem
wrote:
> Hi all!
> I didn't understood the meaning of "must accept t
our assumption is correct as per my understanding of above rfcs
that remote
target set should be updated only when 2xx is sent, whether the request
is reINVITE or UPDATE.
Best Regards,
Sachin Rastogi
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 12:45 PM, hanifa.mohammed <
hanifa.moham...@globaledgesoft.com> wrote
end UA is listening RTP on same port mentioned in
step 2.
Please verify above steps and post the results.
Thanks,
Sachin Rastogi
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 1:17 PM, 이성우 wrote:
> Dear
>
> Have you ever experienced cases that you can not receive any rtp packets
> even after finishing
Rishabh,
Are you facing same issue with INVITE Authorization also ?
Thanks,
*Sachin
*
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> 2009/8/8 rishabh :
> > I am implementing SUBSCRIBE msg in my SIP stack for MWI event...
> >
> > The problem is that i am making getting 401 Unauthorize
MUST tone in G3 fax machine while ANS/CED is a optional tone.
BR,
Sachin Rastogi
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Andrea Rizzi wrote:
> There's no a standard way to renegotiate the T.38 media. Usually it is the
> called party that issues the reINVITE, but there are implementations
t; >
> > 4.1.1. Registration of media type audio/speex
> >
> >Media type name: audio
> >
> >Media subtype name: speex
> >
> >Required parameters:
> >
> >None
> >
> > Optional parameters:
> >
> >
Hi All,
Is there any rfc/draft or recommendation which suggests that 'ptime'
value should multiple of 5 or 10? Can I use 'ptime' value as 11 or 12 or 18
or 19?
Thanks
Sachin Rastogi
___
Sip-implementors mailing l
13 matches
Mail list logo
