Hey friends, Actuallyy I can't take credit for the article... It was actually written by the author N.N.P. I was fortunate enough to have beta tested the software. If you have any question please let me know.
Cheers! Terron -----Original Message----- From: Joshua Morin [mailto:j...@codenomicon.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 12:35 PM To: hanifa.mohammed Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] VoIPER testing tool! Hello, I am not sure if the static URI was done intentionally but random stuff is probably done intentionally. That is the nature of fuzz testing. Hakin9 has a good article written by Terron Williams. It can be found in the link below and is towards the bottom of the website. http://www.hakin9.org/prt/view/pdf-articles.html Cheers, Joshua Morin Security Strategist Codenomicon Ltd. Office: 781-777-2565 Mobile: 617-633-7221 hanifa.mohammed wrote: > Hi all, > > we are trying to use VoIPER testing tool to test our sip client. > Based on the below doc, we are able to run it and packets are sent across. > > http://www.unprotectedhex.com/voiper-wiki/index.php/VoIPER_Usage_Examp > les#Post_testing_-_Debugging_crashes > http://voiper.wiki.sourceforge.net/VoIPER+Usage+Examples > > 1. Is there any way to retreive the report for this testing? > 2. In many test cases, the To uri is hard coded as u...@example.com or > some random stuffs. Is this intentional? > Is there any way to do more confiugration for the sip messages? > > If you have more documentation about this tool, pl share. I googled, > but no luck. > > Best Regards, > Mohammed Hanifa > > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors > _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
