Hi Manju,
Go through this link. That is an open issue as of 2001.
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip/current/msg02152.html
Kummutunnav ga..
*V YAswanth RAparti
B.E Electrical and Electronics.
*
On 10 July 2013 11:17, manju nath wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Does any one has
/asterisk_pbx_linux_p2
*V YAswanth RAparti
B.E Electrical and Electronics.
*
On 2 February 2013 16:52, satya r wrote:
> hi all,
>
>
> plz tell me,
> 1. how to provisioning pbx ?
>
>
> Actually i a fresher only one year of experience in sip testing so i
> faced a question in
Hi Brett,
Actually, I gave some random URI to hide the original uri. The original SIP
URI does not have any '%' . It was encoded though.
*V YAswanth RAparti
B.E Electrical and Electronics.
*
On 25 January 2013 17:48, Brett Tate wrote:
> > Thus the encrypted contact is ei
Hi,
We have encountered a problem in which the URI in the contact header is
being encrypted by the proxy. Further requests are unable to reach the
destination.
Is there any spec which tells about the encryption of contact header? I was
not able to get any literature from internet about it.
The con
first update, it might want to send 491 pending request.
*V YAswanth RAparti
B.E Electrical and Electronics.
*
On 16 January 2013 17:10, deepak bansal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please see detailed Scenario below:
>
> UAS -
Contact header MUST be present in the requests that lead to the
establishing of a dialogue. In your case its INVITE.
According to rfc3261 , in other cases it may not be required. Open to a
discussion though.
*V YAswanth RAparti
B.E Electrical and Electronics.
*
On 3 November 2012 10:09, Tamjid
values ??
Thanks and Regards.
*V YAswanth RAparti
B.E Electrical and Electronics.
*
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
