[Sip-implementors] Authorization Header in the SIP Register.

2023-09-02 Thread Zuñiga , Guillermo
HI fellows, I hope everyone be ok. I would like someone can help me with the following. I have been through the web trying looking for the RFC who talks about the parameter values of the Authorization header in the SIP Register. I have the following from one guide that I have, but I would like

Re: [Sip-implementors] PSTN parameters in the FROM INVITE

2019-10-11 Thread Zuñiga , Guillermo
Thanks a lot. Do you have any idea what means the value 8084818088? Regards, Guillermo De: Ranjit Avasarala [mailto:ranjitka...@gmail.com] Enviado el: Friday, October 11, 2019 12:42 PM Para: Zuñiga, Guillermo; Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Asunto: Re: [Sip-implementors] PSTN parameters

Re: [Sip-implementors] PSTN parameters in the FROM INVITE

2019-10-11 Thread Zuñiga , Guillermo
specific PSTN parameters in a > pstn-params= entry in outgoing INVITE messages. The PSTN parameters > currently included in pstn-params are Screening Indicator, ISDN Indicator, > and Transmission Medium Requirement (TMR). BR Philipp Am Do., 10. Okt. 2019 um 22:45 Uhr schrieb

[Sip-implementors] PSTN parameters in the FROM INVITE

2019-10-10 Thread Zuñiga , Guillermo
Hi Fellows, I would like you can help me with the following: I was trying to look for information about what means the numbers that appear in some cases in the FROM header of the INVITE with the following (pstn-params=8084818088). From: ;tag=SDh25j501-gK0a3ed144 Could you help to identify whe

[Sip-implementors] INVITE without Supported 100 Rel is not being routed

2019-09-05 Thread Zuñiga , Guillermo
Hi Fellows, I would like you can help me to be more clear with the following. Why a INVITE arrive to a Class4 Control Switch could not be able to route a INVITE that ingress without a 100rel supported parameter? Example: This is INVITE is not being routed by the C4. Supported: X-cisco-srtp-fal

[Sip-implementors] Authorization Header Values- vs REFER getting SIP 403 Authentication Failure

2019-07-22 Thread Zuñiga , Guillermo
Hi fellows, I would like you can help me with the following doubt. I am having a user is Registering ok to a Registrar Server. Seeing the authorization values I can see that we have the Authorization Header wiht the following Authentication-URI value= sip:domain.com Realm = domain.com But I am

[Sip-implementors] 2 mline in the SDP Request in SRTP negotiation

2018-03-16 Thread Zuñiga , Guillermo
Hi Fellows, I would like you can help me to know if exist any restriction if in a INVITE Request the Endpoint send me 2 mline with the same port, when I am using TLS/SRTP. Endpoint is sending the INVITE like this: m=audio 40084 RTP/AVP 120 9 0 8 18 101 . m=audio 40084 RTP/SAVP 120 9 0 8 18 10

Re: [Sip-implementors] is Contact Header Mandatory and could be anonymous in the INVITE

2018-03-02 Thread Zuñiga , Guillermo
Thanks for that, I Access enviroment not PEER to PEER connection, CONTACT could be anonymous or always should be any valid uri-user? Regards, Thanks Guillermo De: Aman [mailto:amanpreeet.si...@gmail.com] Enviado el: Monday, February 26, 2018 3:11 AM Para: Zuñiga, Guillermo CC: discuss

[Sip-implementors] is Contact Header Mandatory and could be anonymous in the INVITE

2018-02-21 Thread Zuñiga , Guillermo
Hi fellows, I would you can help me to know and be clear about the following questions: Is the CONTACT header mandatory that always have to be present in the INVITE? I am asking that for the case that imagine that Endpoint after is Registered in a Registrar Server, send me the following header i

[Sip-implementors] Question about RFC 3398- Ring back Tone and One Way Audio Issues.

2016-12-12 Thread Zuñiga , Guillermo
Hi Fellows, I am having the following issue with one device that is having one way audio. The Calls is from a SIP UA to PSTN site, when the call is stablishing the only way I have audio in both ways is when in the following case: UASBC/GW->PSTN INVITE---

Re: [Sip-implementors] [SIPForum-discussion] SIP to SS7 Calling Number Information

2016-07-19 Thread Zuñiga , Guillermo
mail: guillermo.zun...@cwpanama.com From: Dale R. Worley [wor...@ariadne.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 9:19 PM To: Zuñiga, Guillermo Cc: discuss...@sipforum.org; sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: Re: [SIPForum-discussion] SIP to SS7 Calling Nu

Re: [Sip-implementors] Handoff

2016-07-12 Thread Zuñiga , Guillermo
Hi fellows, Sorry Roman Somebody know what means the following messages--->Message body is too big: 232253 bytes with a limit of 150 KB Your mail to 'discussion' with the subject RE: SIP to SS7 Calling Number Information Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval

Re: [Sip-implementors] [QUAR] Your message to discussion awaits moderator approval

2016-06-28 Thread Zuñiga , Guillermo
Cel:+507 6670-0481 Email: guillermo.zun...@cwpanama.com -Mensaje original- De: discussion-boun...@sipforum.org [mailto:discussion-boun...@sipforum.org] Enviado el: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 9:45 AM Para: Zuñiga, Guillermo Asunto: [QUAR] Your message to discussion awaits moderator appr

[Sip-implementors] PRACK Messages after the 180

2014-04-25 Thread Zuñiga , Guillermo
Hi Lennox I am trying with just this email and even like this I can get any feedback, and I can´t see the info in the list. Thanks for any feedback. Hi fellows, I am having the following issue with a peer carriers conected to my GW. The scenario is the following, a call with a Invite which head

[Sip-implementors] SIP Unsupported media type

2008-04-21 Thread Zuñiga , Guillermo
Hi Mrs How can give a tips? I am sending Calling from a SipEndpoint to a Fax at the PSTN, And I am getting a SIP Unsupported media type messages and then the connection is drop. In the invite coming from a AplicationServer-AS to a VerazSoftswitch I am seeing the parameter (a=silenceSupp:off -

Re: [Sip-implementors] [SIPForum-discussion] Differences between 2 Invite

2008-04-18 Thread Zuñiga , Guillermo
lermo From: Zuñiga, Guillermo Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 8:30 AM To: 'Halit Sakca'; =?windows-1254?Q?Zu=F1iga; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: RE: [SIPForum-discussion] Differences between 2 Invite SIP endpoint Veraz switch 21

Re: [Sip-implementors] [SIPForum-discussion] Differences between 2 Invite

2008-04-18 Thread Zuñiga , Guillermo
8, 2008 5:51 AM To: =?windows-1254?Q?Zu=F1iga; Zuñiga, Guillermo; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: RE: [SIPForum-discussion] Differences between 2 Invite hey mate, to investigate more efficient could you please let me be clear about the case? "I am sendi

[Sip-implementors] Differences between 2 Invite

2008-04-17 Thread Zuñiga , Guillermo
Mr, Who could help me. I am sending a sip call to the same mgw coming from differences IP-Carriers, The first call with file "invite ok ethereal.txt" is a good call And the other call with file "invite bad ethereal.txt" is a bad call. In the good call I am seeing the parameter (Med

[Sip-implementors] SIP TIMER'S

2008-04-17 Thread Zuñiga , Guillermo
Hi Doctores. I have 2 SBC connected, and I want to delay the timeout of the Call, Cause the Far End is trying to ReRoute the Call until It got free circuits, I am sending Cancel to this Call before he Completed it. I was reading the RFC 3261 and I would like to match my Timers Value in t