Hello ,
I have read this response code with respect to emergency services to provide
alternate service URN in xml body.
Regards,
Sumit Jindal
-Original Message-
From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu
[mailto:sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Iñak
For this you can refer RFC 5057 sec 5.4, but do remember its an informative
RFC.
Regards,
Sumit Jindal
Rancore Technologies
-Original Message-
From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu
[mailto:sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of
Manjunath Warad
Sent:
Hello Karthik,
UAC wanted to terminate the session but before its CANCEL request reached
UAS , uas accepted the INVITE. This is a valid scenario and its handling
purely depends on UAC's programming.
1. It can render this "call connect" to USER
or
2. After receiving 200 Ok could generate BYE w
Hello Manoj
It all depends on your needs and deployment scenario Mainly driven by
telecom operator.
SBC is an edge node functionality and PCSCF is an edge node in IMS.
So these two are related.
Regards,
Sumit Jindal
Rancore Technologies
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[m
Hello Suresh,
RFC 5057 will help you understand dialog creation and termination in a
better way. Go through table on page 9.
But I will suggest you to read the complete RFC before making any decision.
Regards,
Sumit Jindal
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
Hello,
May be draft-ietf-sipping-race-examples-06 is the one you are looking for
better understanding of call flows. It has covered many scenarios including
forking.
And what Anuradha is saying is also a best practice.
Regards,
Sumit Jindal
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[
