[Sip-implementors] B2BUA behavior in correlation of Pre-Conditions & Multiple Early Dialogs

RFC or 3GPP standard but not yet able to find any. Your expert inputs are much appreciated and if it can be provided in some reference to standard it will be very helpful. -- Thanks, Varun Bhatia ___ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implemen

Re: [Sip-implementors] can CRBT palyed without Reliable Provisonal response.

anything. Thanks, Varun On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Sourav Dhar Chaudhuri wrote: > Hi, > Can CRBT works without using Reliable Provisional Response ? > > > > A INVITE (with SDP offer) > B > > A <===

[Sip-implementors] SCTP Multihoming Always sending primary interface ip

Regards, Varun Bhatia ___ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors

Re: [Sip-implementors] UAS behaviour for sending responses

ip to check the correct one for sending the responses. Sent from Iphone, Varun > On 19-Sep-2014, at 22:35, Kchitiz Saxena wrote: > > No Vivek, its definitely not NAT. It is 2 IP addresses in DNS server for a > hostname. > > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 7:50 PM, Vivek Talwar

Re: [Sip-implementors] TCP/NAT handling in SIP

Thanks Ankur, not sure if it is implemented in such manner then we should not honor new connection with INVITE? Thanks, Varun Bhatia > On 29-Apr-2014, at 21:05, ankur bansal wrote: > > Hi Varun , > I dont think sip protocol will have any issue with this .Means you can use > on

Re: [Sip-implementors] TCP/NAT handling in SIP

Thanks Brett, is there any specific standard which indicates that INVITE dialog will be using same connection of REGISTER ? Thanks, Varun On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Brett Tate wrote: > RFC 5626 will likely be helpful. > > > -Original Message- > > From: sip

[Sip-implementors] TCP/NAT handling in SIP

handling between REGISTER request and INVITE request ? Any inputs are appreciated. -- Regards, Varun Bhatia ___ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors

Re: [Sip-implementors] Multiple 200 OK responses processing

t;with a BYE request, using the dialog identifier retrieved from the > >2xx final response. > > > > > > Best Regards, > > Vivek Batra > > > > > > > > *From:* VARUN BHATIA [mailto:varuninbha...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Friday, April 11, 20

Re: [Sip-implementors] Multiple 200 OK responses processing

equest as described in Section 15." > > Best Regards, > Vivek Batra > > > -Original Message- > From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu > [mailto:sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of VARUN > BHATIA > Sent: Friday, April

[Sip-implementors] Multiple 200 OK responses processing

each represents a distinct dialog, with a distinct dialog identifier. The UAC core MUST generate an ACK request for each 2xx received from the transaction layer. Any inputs are really appreciable. Thanks, Varun Bhatia ___ Sip-implementors mailing

Re: [Sip-implementors] Refusing video stream in a SDP

0 RTP/AVP 34 > > port = 0, changing the RTP codec to a known static one (H263). > > > Regards. > > ___ > Sip-implementors mailing list > Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-im

[Sip-implementors] MSRP Grammar for path attribute

Hi, I have received: a=path:msrp://10.166.46.226:7664/CR003+1382409119.486157738;tcp My stack is rejecting it, not sure about the precise grammar for it, seems that this may be due to + sign received in it. Any inputs are appreciable. Thanks, Varun -- Regards, Varun Bhatia

[Sip-implementors] MSRP Grammar for path attribute

Hi, I have received: a=path:msrp://10.166.46.226:7664/CR003+1382409119.486157738;tcp My stack is rejecting it, not sure about the precise grammar for it, seems that this may be due to + sign received in it. Any inputs are appreciable. Thanks, Varun

Re: [Sip-implementors] Publish method for presence server

Hi, I would really appreciate if somebody could answer the below questions. Regards varun --- On Wed, 12/15/10, varun wrote: > From: varun > Subject: [Sip-implementors] Publish method for presence server > To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu > Date: Wednesday, December 15,

[Sip-implementors] Publish method for presence server

rify this. Regards Varun ___ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

[Sip-implementors] dynamic payload negotiation

happen in this case. Regards Varun ___ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

[Sip-implementors] SIP Proxy authorization

Hi, When a SIP UA sends an Invite with Authorization credentials( username and password) to Proxy, how does the proxy authenticate the username/password, I mean how does the proxy know if it wants to allow that particular user to make a call. Appreciate your response. Thanks varun

Re: [Sip-implementors] Expires header in INVITE

It would be really helpful if somebody could reply to this. Thanks Varun --- varun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > The expires header field specifies the time duration > for which the request is valid( lets say INVITE). > Can i specify the Expires header field greater th

Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP Doubts

3xx,4xx response, cant ACK go end to end if the UAS has specified its Contact header field... Please clarify. Thanks Varun --- Bob Penfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The ACK for 2xx is a separate transaction because it > needs to go end-to-end. > ACK for 3xx-6xx are h

[Sip-implementors] Expires header in INVITE

terminated in 32 secs). What if expires is less than 32 secs( 64 *T1)and no final response is received during that time, who will terminate the transaction (UAS or UAC)...will UAS send some 4xx response in this case? Thanks varun

Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP Doubts

My first query still remains unanswered, would be glad if somebody could put across his thoughts. Thanks Varun 1>In case of Invite-200 OK, why is ACK a separate transaction while for any other non2xx final response, ACK is a part of the same transaction. --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wr

[Sip-implementors] SIP Doubts

ctions?Does it forward it upstream to UAC? What does a 6xx response exactly mean( global failure??.. 3> When a UAC transaction times out, it generates a 408 locally. Is there a case in which 408 is send from the UAS/PROXY?? I would appreciate if somebody could answer my queries ASAP. Tha

Re: [Sip-implementors] Privacy and P-asserted Identity headers

Could somebody reply please~! --- varun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > I tried to understand the use of privacy and > P-asserted Identity headers in SIP but not really > clear about these. > Could somebody explain in simple terms the use of > these two headers.

[Sip-implementors] Privacy and P-asserted Identity headers

Hi, I tried to understand the use of privacy and P-asserted Identity headers in SIP but not really clear about these. Could somebody explain in simple terms the use of these two headers. Need this info ASAP, would be really helpful if somebody could reply. Regards varun

Re: [Sip-implementors] Call hold and a = inactive

oes it mean no media path in both directions or same as case 1( one way media from A->B)/. Please reply ASAP. Thanks varun --- Andrea Rizzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There are no violations at all in responding with > inactive, and as you > mentioned this will suspend any me

[Sip-implementors] Call hold and a = inactive

? Thanks varun Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail, news, photos & more. http://mobile.yahoo.com/go?refer=1GNXIC ___

[Sip-implementors] Tel URL

Hi, Where exactly is tel URL used, how is a tel URL converted into a SIP URL.Please give some details. Thanks varun Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows. Yahoo

[Sip-implementors] Dynamic Payload Types in SDP

Hi, What actually is a dynamic Payload type in SIP.Can somebody please explain? Thanks Varun Luggage? GPS? Comic books? Check out fitting gifts for grads at Yahoo! Search http://search.yahoo.com/search

Re: [Sip-implementors] BYE on early dialog

Hi, If Cancel is send to a proxy for an Invite which has been forked by the proxy, will the cancel also get forked and send to the differenet UAS. Thanks varun --- Patel Nishant-JTPD86 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Varun, > > An INVITE that is forked can cause multiple

[Sip-implementors] BYE on early dialog

Varun Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail, news, photos & more. http://mobile.yahoo.com/go?refer=1GNXIC ___

Re: [Sip-implementors] Ack is lost

Could anybody reply please?? Thanks in advance varun --- varun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > Another media issue: > > user A->GateWay->user B > > --->Invite > < 200 OK > > Ack is lost( no Ack) > > Here the G

Re: [Sip-implementors] Early media issues

Hi, I am talking about a case in which SIP side starts sending media but the other end of call is not ready yet to play media.So what should the gateway do? Buffer the media or just drop the media packets!! Thanks Varun --- Vishal Mathur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Varun, > >

[Sip-implementors] Ack is lost

e get an ACK. Thanks varun Shape Yahoo! in your own image. Join our Network Research Panel today! http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7 ___

[Sip-implementors] Early media issues

media. Please suggest. Regards varun Luggage? GPS? Comic books? Check out fitting gifts for grads at Yahoo! Search http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mail&p=graduation+g

Re: [Sip-implementors] Can B2BUA add record-route?

How will B2BUA ensure that it remain in call siganlling path without adding the record route??Could you explain please? Thanks Varun --- A B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A B2BUA adding a record-route does not make sense. > > Consider the below scenario, a call from A to B via