[Sip-implementors] Changing in "o=" field

2017-11-20 Thread wisniawy
Hello My Application Server sends a re-INVITE to the called party pointing in the SDP a Media Server instead of calling party IP address (included in original INVITE).   INVITE: o=BroadWorks 204147 1 IN IP4 10.8.91.9   re-INVITE: o=BroadWorks 204150 1 IN IP4 10.8.92.133   The re-INVITE is dropped

[Sip-implementors] OPTION, tag in "to" field

2011-04-28 Thread wisniawy
Hi How UAS should react having received OPTIONS, out of the dialog, with "To" field containing tag? Is "8.2.6.2 Headers and Tags" from RFC3261 proper requirement for this isue? In my case UAS respond with 481Unknown Dialog. Regards Bartek ___ Sip-implem

Re: [Sip-implementors] lack of SDP items

2011-04-20 Thread wisniawy
Hi Of course it's mandatory. The question is how UAC should react receiving malformed SDP. I was executing so far conformance test with Cisco Call Manager and Alcatel OXE. Both responded with 200OK containing SDP filled with missing item. When I ran the traffic through the SIP platform I got: 400

[Sip-implementors] lack of SDP items

2011-04-20 Thread wisniawy
Hi all I’m working on technical SIP requirements for end-points devices and I can’t find an answer for one question. How UAS should behave receiving INVITE that contains SDP without one of following items: v, o, s ,t. For example having received IVITE without origin: v=0 s=TT c=IN IP4 10.15.21.1