AT problems and functions as Full Cone
NAT. So, STUN can be used.
So, does implementing 'rport' will add value to my SIP Stack core?
Thanks,
T. Keerthi Kumar
--- On Tue, 24/11/09, Attila Sipos wrote:
From: Attila Sipos
Subject: RE: [Sip-implementors] [RPort] Reque
9, Attila Sipos wrote:
>
>
> From: Attila Sipos
> Subject: RE: [Sip-implementors] [RPort] Request to know unique use case of
> rport
> To: "KEERTHI KUMAR" ,
> sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> Cc: thov...@yahoo.com
> Date: Tuesday, 24 November, 2009, 3:56 PM
plementing 'rport' will add value to my SIP Stack core?
Thanks,
T. Keerthi Kumar
--- On Tue, 24/11/09, Attila Sipos wrote:
From: Attila Sipos
Subject: RE: [Sip-implementors] [RPort] Request to know unique use case of rport
To: "KEERTHI KUMAR" ,
sip-implementors@
El Martes, 24 de Noviembre de 2009, KEERTHI KUMAR escribió:
> Hi All,
> Myself Keerthi Kumar, currently planning to implement 'rport'
> support in the SIP Stack using RFC 3581. But, now i am stuk at finding a
> Valid use case that 'rport' solves and leads over STUN or other NAT
> traver
I
> KUMAR
> Sent: 24 November 2009 10:21
> To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> Cc: thov...@yahoo.com
> Subject: [Sip-implementors] [RPort] Request to know unique use case of rport
>
> Hi All,
> Myself Keerthi Kumar, currently planning to implement 'rp
plementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: thov...@yahoo.com
Subject: [Sip-implementors] [RPort] Request to know unique use case of rport
Hi All,
Myself Keerthi Kumar, currently planning to implement 'rport' support
in the SIP Stack using RFC 3581. But, now i am stuk at finding a Valid u
Hi All,
Myself Keerthi Kumar, currently planning to implement 'rport' support
in the SIP Stack using RFC 3581. But, now i am stuk at finding a Valid use case
that 'rport' solves and leads over STUN or other NAT traversal techniques.
So, i request you to please suggest me few use cases
