Re: [Sip-implementors] 100Rel from UAS

2009-06-24 Thread Dale Worley
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 17:10 +0400, Kashin Mihail wrote: > Hi, everybody! > > Is it legitimate for UAS to request reliable provisional response > option after receiving INVITE without Required or Supported headers. > > In my case the flow is like this > > > > Inv (no 100Rel*)-> > > <-100 Tryi

Re: [Sip-implementors] 100Rel from UAS

2009-06-24 Thread Abhishek Dhammawat
: [Sip-implementors] 100Rel from UAS Hi, everybody! Is it legitimate for UAS to request reliable provisional response option after receiving INVITE without Required or Supported headers. In my case the flow is like this Inv (no 100Rel*)-> <-100 Trying <- 180 Trying (no 100Rel) *

Re: [Sip-implementors] 100Rel from UAS

2009-06-24 Thread Attila Sipos
essage- From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mailto:sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Kashin Mihail Sent: 17 June 2009 14:11 To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: [Sip-implementors] 100Rel from UAS Hi, everybody! Is it legitimate for UAS to reque

[Sip-implementors] 100Rel from UAS

2009-06-24 Thread Kashin Mihail
Hi, everybody! Is it legitimate for UAS to request reliable provisional response option after receiving INVITE without Required or Supported headers. In my case the flow is like this Inv (no 100Rel*)-> <-100 Trying <- 180 Trying (no 100Rel) ** <-INFO (Required:100Rel) 200OK(no 100Rel)