Olle E. Johansson wrote:
> 6 aug 2009 kl. 12.49 skrev Vivek Batra:
>
Greetings,
I am wondering if the below scenario is valid or not.
<-- 183 (with SDP) then,
<-- 180 (without SDP)
>>> Yes it's.
>>> However it depends in UAC behaviour on how to render it to the human
>>>
I just saw this thread. Thanks Mikael for your response. Its the best
one available for this case, assuming (as the original poster has
confirmed) that this is all one dialog.
If there is early media flowing, you probably don't want to preempt it
with a generated ringback. But if there is no me
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 05:27:10PM +0530, Abhishek Dhammawat wrote:
> Hi
>
> In my opinion RBT(Ring Back Tone) should be played.
>
> regards
> Abhishek Dhammawat
>
Since nobody has mentioned RFC 3960 I thought it would be appropriate to
quote a portion of section 3.2[1].
With this in mind,
Miguel
Oreilly
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 5:20 PM
To: Abhishek Dhammawat
Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] 180 Ringing after 183 Session progress
In addition to this;
Do you think there should be a RBT or no?
In the case that I am investigating there is
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] 180 Ringing after 183 Session progress
In addition to this;
Do you think there should be a RBT or no?
In the case that I am investigating there is no RBT.
2009/8/6 Miguel Oreilly
mailto:miguel.orei...@gmail.com>>
for clarification;
183 ( with SDP ) a
ia.edu [mailto:
>> sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Iñaki Baz
>> Castillo
>> Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 4:23 PM
>> Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
>> Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] 180 Ringing after 183 Session progress
lumbia.edu [mailto:
> sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Iñaki Baz
> Castillo
> Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 4:23 PM
> Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] 180 Ringing after 183 Session progress
>
> 2009/8
2009/8/6 Abhishek Dhammawat :
> Hi
>
> I would request you not to remove the original question from the mail chain
> for better understanding of the issue I am putting the question by Miguel
> orielly again
>
>
> "I am wondering if the below scenario is valid or not.
>
> <-- 183 (with SDP) then,
essage-
From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu
[mailto:sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Iñaki Baz
Castillo
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 4:23 PM
Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] 180 Ringing after 183 Session pr
2009/8/6 Olle E. Johansson :
> On a related topic. What should one do in this case?
>
> <--- 183 with sdp from UA 1
> (10 secs)
> <--- 183 with sdp from UA 2
> (5 secs)
> <--- 180 ringing from UA 3
> <--- 200 OK from UA 3
>
> From testing, different devices do very different things.
That is not s
6 aug 2009 kl. 12.49 skrev Vivek Batra:
>>> Greetings,
>>> I am wondering if the below scenario is valid or not.
>>>
>>> <-- 183 (with SDP) then,
>>> <-- 180 (without SDP)
>>
>> Yes it's.
>> However it depends in UAC behaviour on how to render it to the human
>> (it could choose to render the ear
6 aug 2009 kl. 12.53 skrev Iñaki Baz Castillo:
> 2009/8/6 Abhishek Dhammawat :
>> The below is valid scenario.
>>
>> Also RFC 3261 section 13.2.1 mentions
>>
>> "The UAC MUST treat the first session description it receives as
>> the answer,
>> and MUST ignore any session descriptions in subsequ
2009/8/6 Abhishek Dhammawat :
> The below is valid scenario.
>
> Also RFC 3261 section 13.2.1 mentions
>
> "The UAC MUST treat the first session description it receives as the answer,
> and MUST ignore any session descriptions in subsequent responses to the
> initial INVITE."
This is fully incor
2009/8/6 Vivek Batra :
> [Vivek] - With some ITSP's, 183 Session Progress is sent (with SDP) to play
> the music (something like, please wait while your call is on wait) when
> actual called party is busy. However, 180 Ringing is sent as soon as call
> has been placed to called party and called par
plementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: [Sip-implementors] 180 Ringing after 183 Session progress
Greetings,
I am wondering if the below scenario is valid or not.
<-- 183 (with SDP) then,
<-- 180 (without SDP)
Thanks in advance,
Miguel
___
>> Greetings,
>> I am wondering if the below scenario is valid or not.
>>
>> <-- 183 (with SDP) then,
>> <-- 180 (without SDP)
>
> Yes it's.
> However it depends in UAC behaviour on how to render it to the human
> (it could choose to render the early-media comming from the same 183,
> or it could c
al Message-
From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu
[mailto:sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Miguel
Oreilly
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 3:12 PM
To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: [Sip-implementors] 180 Ringing after 183 Sessio
6 aug 2009 kl. 12.07 skrev Iñaki Baz Castillo:
> 2009/8/6 Miguel Oreilly :
>> Greetings,
>> I am wondering if the below scenario is valid or not.
>>
>> <-- 183 (with SDP) then,
>> <-- 180 (without SDP)
>
> Yes it's.
> However it depends in UAC behaviour on how to render it to the human
> (it coul
2009/8/6 Miguel Oreilly :
> Greetings,
> I am wondering if the below scenario is valid or not.
>
> <-- 183 (with SDP) then,
> <-- 180 (without SDP)
Yes it's.
However it depends in UAC behaviour on how to render it to the human
(it could choose to render the early-media comming from the same 183,
o
Greetings,
I am wondering if the below scenario is valid or not.
<-- 183 (with SDP) then,
<-- 180 (without SDP)
Thanks in advance,
Miguel
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslist
Yes.
Jyoti Parija wrote:
> Can we send 180 Ringing after sending 183 session progress?
>
> Thanks,
> Jyoti
>
>
> ___
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implem
Can we send 180 Ringing after sending 183 session progress?
Thanks,
Jyoti
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
22 matches
Mail list logo
