Inline ... >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >Behalf Of Attila Sipos >Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 6:34 AM >To: Brocha Strous; sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu >Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] 180 with body AFTER 183 with >body - is itvalid > > >it is ok because this is what happens in forking scenarios. I agree that it is ok for UAS to send 180 with sdp after 183 with sdp, but it is not comparable to forking scenario. Because in case of forking 18xs coming from different forked endpoints will have different to-tags and so each will have a separate early dialog with the UAC.
Sanjay _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
