Re: [Sip-implementors] 183 session

2017-09-19 Thread Paul Kyzivat
On 9/19/17 11:28 AM, Verma, Salil (Nokia - IN/Noida) wrote: Hi , Please help me to understand the difference between 183 with SDP and without SDP. A 183 without SDP has no role in the offer/answer process. It mostly just says "I'm working on your call." In the absence of the 100rel option

[Sip-implementors] 183 session

2017-09-19 Thread Verma, Salil (Nokia - IN/Noida)
Hi , Please help me to understand the difference between 183 with SDP and without SDP. Is it really required to send 183 after invite r we can directly send 180 ringing ? In which all condition we have to send 183 Regards. ___ Sip-implementors

Re: [Sip-implementors] 183 Session Progress after 180 Ringing (with Same To Tag)

2009-09-02 Thread Brett Tate
Is it possible to receive 183 Session Progress after 180 Ringing (with Same To Tag)? Yes. If so, under what cases? Whenever the UAS wants to send 183 after 180. ___ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu

Re: [Sip-implementors] 183 Session Progress after 180 Ringing (withSame To Tag)

2009-09-02 Thread Avasarala Ranjit-A20990
, September 02, 2009 4:08 PM To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: [Sip-implementors] 183 Session Progress after 180 Ringing (withSame To Tag) Hi all, Is it possible to receive 183 Session Progress after 180 Ringing (with Same To Tag)? If so, under what cases? Thanks, raik

Re: [Sip-implementors] 183 Session Progress after 180 Ringing(withSame To Tag)

2009-09-02 Thread Vivek Batra
, September 02, 2009 10:05 PM To: raikkme r; sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] 183 Session Progress after 180 Ringing(withSame To Tag) Can u give me a use case where UAS wants to send both 183 and 180 one after the other? Thanks Regards Ranjit -Original