Re: [Sip-implementors] 200OK without SDP.

2009-06-04 Thread Paul Kyzivat
-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mailto:sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Harsimran Singh Sent: 01 June 2009 11:25 To: Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: [Sip-implementors] 200OK without SDP. Hi I am confused about the section 13.2 of RFC 3261

[Sip-implementors] 200OK without SDP.

2009-06-01 Thread Harsimran Singh
Hi I am confused about the section 13.2 of RFC 3261. The description given in the RFC looks inconsistent. My call flow is as follows: INVITE with sdp Supp 100rel --- 100 Trying 180 Ringing with Req 100rel sdp PRACK no sdp 200OK for prack no sdp

Re: [Sip-implementors] 200OK without SDP.

2009-06-01 Thread Rohit Aggarwal
] On Behalf Of Harsimran Singh Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 3:55 PM To: Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: [Sip-implementors] 200OK without SDP. Hi I am confused about the section 13.2 of RFC 3261. The description given in the RFC looks inconsistent. My call flow is as follows

Re: [Sip-implementors] 200OK without SDP.

2009-06-01 Thread Rastogi, Vipul (Vipul)
:55 PM To: Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: [Sip-implementors] 200OK without SDP. Hi I am confused about the section 13.2 of RFC 3261. The description given in the RFC looks inconsistent. My call flow is as follows: INVITE with sdp Supp 100rel --- 100 Trying 180

Re: [Sip-implementors] 200OK without SDP.

2009-06-01 Thread Attila Sipos
@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: [Sip-implementors] 200OK without SDP. Hi I am confused about the section 13.2 of RFC 3261. The description given in the RFC looks inconsistent. My call flow is as follows: INVITE with sdp Supp 100rel --- 100 Trying 180 Ringing with Req 100rel sdp