Re: [Sip-implementors] 2nd try: sip2pstn: P-Asserted-Identity and P-Preferred-Identity

2009/7/20 Uwe Kastens kiste...@googlemail.com: Hello list, Looks like, that my 1st posting is lost. It's not lost, just nobody replied it. I don't if anybody give me a hint. Until today I was very sure the the  P-Asserted-Identity is trusted and the P-Preferred-Identity is untrusted. So

Re: [Sip-implementors] 2nd try: sip2pstn: P-Asserted-Identity and P-Preferred-Identity

Hello list, Looks like, that my 1st posting is lost. It's not lost, just nobody replied it. Ok I did not receive the mail via the list. A good example for understand the difficult meaning of P-Preferred-Identity (and probably the only onw) is the usage with anonymous call, where the

Re: [Sip-implementors] 2nd try: sip2pstn: P-Asserted-Identity and P-Preferred-Identity

2009/7/20 Uwe Kastens kiste...@googlemail.com: Looks like, that my 1st posting is lost. It's not lost, just nobody replied it. Ok I did not receive the mail  via the list. Gmail doesn't display in Inbox a mail sent by you :) But the mail did arrive to the list:

[Sip-implementors] 2nd try: sip2pstn: P-Asserted-Identity and P-Preferred-Identity

Hello list, Looks like, that my 1st posting is lost. I don't if anybody give me a hint. Until today I was very sure the the P-Asserted-Identity is trusted and the P-Preferred-Identity is untrusted. So it is wise to map the asserted to the pstn number which is the carrier trusted (network