why not use 422? This extension introduces the 422 (Session Interval Too Small) response code. It is generated by a UAS or proxy when a request contains a Session-Expires header field with a duration below the minimum timer for the server. The 422 response MUST contain a Min-SE header field with the minimum timer for that server.
I'd just reply with 422 and put "Min-SE: 90". Regards, Attila -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jagan Mohan Sent: 28 March 2008 10:21 To: SIP Implementors Subject: [Sip-implementors] A query regarding Min-SE header value being lessthan 90 seconds Hi, Could you please tell me what should a SIP entity do if it receives a session refresh request with Min-SE header value less than 90 seconds? I would like to know what Error Response should be sent in this scenario. I don't think 422 Response is appropriate for this scenario. I'm aware that as per RFC 4028, any SIP element MUST NOT send a refresh request with Min-SE header value less than 90 sec. Regards, Jagan _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
