Re: [Sip-implementors] B2BUA behavior in correlation of Pre-Conditions & Multiple Early Dialogs

2017-10-06 Thread Dale R. Worley
VARUN BHATIA writes: > As a B2BUA what is the expectation when it is sitting behind a forking > proxy (IMS Application Server) and it is sending back multiple early > dialogs back. > > 1. It should ideally send it back transparently to ingress i.e. > creating multiple

Re: [Sip-implementors] B2BUA behavior in correlation of Pre-Conditions & Multiple Early Dialogs

2017-10-06 Thread Paul Kyzivat
On 10/6/17 2:42 PM, VARUN BHATIA wrote: Hello, As a B2BUA what is the expectation when it is sitting behind a forking proxy (IMS Application Server) and it is sending back multiple early dialogs back. 1. It should ideally send it back transparently to ingress i.e. creating multiple early

[Sip-implementors] B2BUA behavior in correlation of Pre-Conditions & Multiple Early Dialogs

2017-10-06 Thread VARUN BHATIA
Hello, As a B2BUA what is the expectation when it is sitting behind a forking proxy (IMS Application Server) and it is sending back multiple early dialogs back. 1. It should ideally send it back transparently to ingress i.e. creating multiple early dialogs at ingress leg too. (UAC should be