Re: [Sip-implementors] BYE retransmissions

2012-04-04 Thread Leo Leo
: sip-implementors sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Enviadas: Terça-feira, 3 de Abril de 2012 22:26 Assunto: Re: [Sip-implementors] BYE retransmissions comments inline... On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 12:55 AM, M. Ranganathan mra...@gmail.com wrote: Consider the following scenario: UA sends peer

Re: [Sip-implementors] BYE retransmissions

2012-04-04 Thread Nataraju A.B
-implementors sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Enviadas: Terça-feira, 3 de Abril de 2012 22:26 Assunto: Re: [Sip-implementors] BYE retransmissions comments inline... On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 12:55 AM, M. Ranganathan mra...@gmail.com wrote: Consider the following scenario: UA sends peer

[Sip-implementors] BYE retransmissions

2012-04-03 Thread M. Ranganathan
Consider the following scenario: UA sends peer UA BYE Recipient of BYE sends OK and tears down the dialog. OK gets lost so sender of UA re-sends BYE. Now there's a dialog in Terminated State but no server transaction (it has already been removed). What is the most appropriate way for the

Re: [Sip-implementors] BYE retransmissions

2012-04-03 Thread Nataraju A.B
comments inline... On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 12:55 AM, M. Ranganathan mra...@gmail.com wrote: Consider the following scenario: UA sends peer UA BYE Recipient of BYE sends OK and tears down the dialog. OK gets lost so sender of UA re-sends BYE. Now there's a dialog in Terminated State but no