s-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of
OKUMURA Shinji
Sent: Friday, August 21, 2009 9:11 AM
To: Paul Kyzivat
Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Can EP send media only peer supports
Hi Paul,
comment inline.
Paul Kyzivat
>OKUMURA Shinji wrote:
>
ation, so things must be done carefully.
>>>
>>> If it is considered that there is ambiguity about how this should be
>>> implemented, then a clarification would be a good thing. But it will
>>> then take some work to decide which of the possible interpret
Thanks,
>> Paul
>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Regards,
>>> -Rockson
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Paul Kyzivat (pkyzivat)
>>> Sent: Saturday, August 15, 2009 7:54 AM
>>> To: Dale Worley
>>> Cc: Rockson Li (zh
egards,
>> -Rockson
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: Paul Kyzivat (pkyzivat)
>> Sent: Saturday, August 15, 2009 7:54 AM
>> To: Dale Worley
>> Cc: Rockson Li (zhengyli); sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
>> Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Can
ain a sub-set of media formats listed in the
>offer.
>
>Regards
>Satya T
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Rockson Li (zhengyli) [mailto:zheng...@cisco.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 12:42 PM
>To: T Satyanarayana-A12694; Paul Kyzivat (pkyzivat)
>Cc: sip-implementor
in the
>offer.
>
>Regards
>Satya T
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Rockson Li (zhengyli) [mailto:zheng...@cisco.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 12:42 PM
>To: T Satyanarayana-A12694; Paul Kyzivat (pkyzivat)
>Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
>Subje
in the
>offer.
>
>Regards
>Satya T
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Rockson Li (zhengyli) [mailto:zheng...@cisco.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 12:42 PM
>To: T Satyanarayana-A12694; Paul Kyzivat (pkyzivat)
>Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
>Subje
2694
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 1:50 AM
To: Paul Kyzivat (pkyzivat)
Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Can EP send media only peer supports
Sorry, I meant "Even if the answerer is prepared to receive"..
-Original Message---
(pkyzivat)
Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Can EP send media only peer supports
Sorry, I meant "Even if the answerer is prepared to receive"..
-Original Message-
From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu
[mailto:sip-impleme
on."
> Regards
> Satya T
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Kyzivat [mailto:pkyzi...@cisco.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 7:53 PM
> To: T Satyanarayana-A12694
> Cc: Dale Worley; sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> Subject: Re: [Sip-impl
Kyzivat
Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Can EP send media only peer supports
Yes, I do agree that implementations have done a good job of working
with this ambiguity so far. And, it is not as much an issue.
However, I am having a difficulty to visualize
e no known use cases warranting this
condition."
Regards
Satya T
-Original Message-
From: Paul Kyzivat [mailto:pkyzi...@cisco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 7:53 PM
To: T Satyanarayana-A12694
Cc: Dale Worley; sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Ca
tors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> Subject: RE: [Sip-implementors] Can EP send media only peer supports
>
> On Sat, 2009-08-15 at 23:35 +0800, T Satyanarayana-A12694 wrote:
>> Additional round trips should be made optional (only for
>> implementations having concurrent codecs limitation).
&g
-Original Message-
From: Dale Worley [mailto:dwor...@nortel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 1:37 AM
To: T Satyanarayana-A12694
Cc: Paul Kyzivat; sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: RE: [Sip-implementors] Can EP send media only peer supports
On Sat, 2009-08-15 at 23:35
Dale Worley wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-08-15 at 23:35 +0800, T Satyanarayana-A12694 wrote:
>> Additional round trips should be made optional (only for implementations
>> having concurrent codecs limitation).
>>
>> Additionally, why can't the spec be modified (or place in a BCP):
>> 1. to allow only a
On Sat, 2009-08-15 at 23:35 +0800, T Satyanarayana-A12694 wrote:
> Additional round trips should be made optional (only for implementations
> having concurrent codecs limitation).
>
> Additionally, why can't the spec be modified (or place in a BCP):
> 1. to allow only a sub-set (of what is presen
-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu
[mailto:sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of
Paul Kyzivat
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 9:23 PM
To: Rockson Li (zhengyli)
Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Can EP send media only peer supports
Rockson Li (zhe
); sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Can EP send media only peer supports
>
> comment at end.
>
> Dale Worley wrote:
>> On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 14:41 +0800, Rockson Li (zhengyli) wrote:
>>> I think answerer can add additional codec G7
Satyanarayana-A12694
Sent: Saturday, August 15, 2009 11:35 PM
To: Paul Kyzivat (pkyzivat); Dale Worley
Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Can EP send media only peer supports
Additional round trips should be made optional (only for implementations
having concurrent
); sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Can EP send media only peer supports
comment at end.
Dale Worley wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 14:41 +0800, Rockson Li (zhengyli) wrote:
>> I think answerer can add additional codec G729 here per sec 6.1 of
&
ailto:sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of
Paul Kyzivat
Sent: Saturday, August 15, 2009 5:24 AM
To: Dale Worley
Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Can EP send media only peer supports
comment at end.
Dale Worley wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-08
comment at end.
Dale Worley wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 14:41 +0800, Rockson Li (zhengyli) wrote:
>> I think answerer can add additional codec G729 here per sec 6.1 of
>> rfc3264
>>
>>
>>The stream MAY indicate additional media formats, not listed in the
>>corresponding stream in the o
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 14:41 +0800, Rockson Li (zhengyli) wrote:
> I think answerer can add additional codec G729 here per sec 6.1 of
> rfc3264
>
>
>The stream MAY indicate additional media formats, not listed in the
>corresponding stream in the offer, that the answerer is willing to
>
gt;Behalf Of ext Rockson Li (zhengyli)
>>Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 2:42 AM
>>To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
>>Subject: [Sip-implementors] Can EP send media only peer supports
>>
>>Hi folks,
>>
>>Going through RFC3264, I find some inconsis
Hi folks,
Going through RFC3264, I find some inconsistency between offerer and
answerer.
Suppose offer/answer below
Offer:
m=audio 49170 RTP/AVP 0 4
a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
a=rtpmap:4 G723/8000
Answer:
m=audio 49172 RTP/AVP 0 18
a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000
I th
25 matches
Mail list logo
