Thanks Paul and Brett for prompt response.
Regards,
Ambrish
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 11:41 PM, Paul Kyzivat
wrote:
> On 11/20/14 1:38 AM, Ambrish Kumar wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>>
>> We read the RFC 3966 and understood that the global number should be
>> prefixed with “+” and if it is not prefixed
On 11/20/14 1:38 AM, Ambrish Kumar wrote:
Hi All,
We read the RFC 3966 and understood that the global number should be
prefixed with “+” and if it is not prefixed with “+” then it is considered
to be a local number and a phone-context is a MUST.
But the section 7.4 is a bit confusing to the
> We read the RFC 3966 and understood that the global number
> should be prefixed with “+” and if it is not prefixed with “+”
> then it is considered to be a local number and a phone-context
> is a MUST.
Your understanding is correct.
"As noted earlier, all phone numbers MUST use the global form
Hi All,
We read the RFC 3966 and understood that the global number should be
prefixed with “+” and if it is not prefixed with “+” then it is considered
to be a local number and a phone-context is a MUST.
But the section 7.4 is a bit confusing to the ABNF syntax of global number.
Does it mean
