all,
While de-registering, if REGISTER has Contact as '*', can the Registrar
put '*'
in the Contact header of 200 OK response?
Is this valid?
Best Regards,
Mohammed Hanifa
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Hi,
why does the registrar wants to put * in the response? The contact uri in
200 respose is to tell its contact uri to the UAC. I guess the sip grammar
will not allow it. Any particular reason you want to do this??
cheers!!
sarvpriya
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 4:28 PM, hanifa.mohammed
Syntactically correct, but semantically wrong. Client validation layer may
crib.
Regards
-Satan
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 4:28 PM, hanifa.mohammed
hanifa.moham...@globaledgesoft.com wrote:
all,
While de-registering, if REGISTER has Contact as '*', can the Registrar
put '*'
in the Contact
From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu
[sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of hanifa.mohammed
[hanifa.moham...@globaledgesoft.com]
all,
While de-registering, if REGISTER has Contact as '*', can the Registrar put
2010/10/12 hanifa.mohammed hanifa.moham...@globaledgesoft.com:
When UAC assumes that '*' is to remove all contacts, why can't the Server use
the same to
imply that no contacts are now present for UAC in Registrar?
This makes no sense. If UAC de-registers all its contact, the
registrar must
