See below.
Thanks,
Neel.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Iñaki Baz Castillo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 9:31 AM
To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: [Sip-implementors] Different SDP in same early
: [Sip-implementors] Different SDP in same early-dialog (same To_tag)
Hi, I'm 100% sure that an UAC receiving two different SDP's during the same
early-dialog (SDP_1 in 183 and SDP_2 in 200) should ignore/discard the second
SDP_2.
This is not allowed from the same UAS.
This is called out
Hi, I'm 100% sure that an UAC receiving two different SDP's during the same
early-dialog (SDP_1 in 183 and SDP_2 in 200) should ignore/discard the second
SDP_2.
But could I know in which section of RFC 3261 (or other) is it specified? I
don't remember it now...
Thanks a lot.
--
Iñaki Baz
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I'm 100% sure that an UAC receiving two different SDP's during the same
early-dialog (SDP_1 in 183 and SDP_2 in 200) should ignore/discard the second
SDP_2.
There is not different SDP in an unreliable provisional
INVITE.
fyi
-Rockson
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of I?aki Baz
Castillo
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 11:32 PM
To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: [Sip-implementors] Different SDP in same early-dialog (same To_tag)
Hi
El Viernes, 28 de Noviembre de 2008, Rockson Li (zhengyli) escribió:
13.2.1 Creating the Initial INVITE
Thanks !
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
