El Martes, 5 de Mayo de 2009, Paul Kyzivat escribió:
> We are picking over nits. The proposed change to the wording in the bug
> just makes it clearer that you can return a response with no contacts
> when there are no contacts registered. IMO the current wording allows
> returning no Contacts when
Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> 2009/5/5 Paul Kyzivat :
>> Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
>>
>>> Please Bob, read the *oficially* reported bug about this subject which
>>> had a long discussion some time ago:
>>> http://bugs.sipit.net/show_bug.cgi?id=775
>
>
>> I agree with Bob that there is no bug. It
] Doubt on inclussion of Contact header in 200 OK
to deregistration
2009/5/5 Paul Kyzivat :
>
> Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
>
>> Please Bob, read the *oficially* reported bug about this subject which
>> had a long discussion some time ago:
>> http://bugs.sipit.net/show_bug.cgi?
2009/5/5 Paul Kyzivat :
>
> Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
>
>> Please Bob, read the *oficially* reported bug about this subject which
>> had a long discussion some time ago:
>> http://bugs.sipit.net/show_bug.cgi?id=775
> I agree with Bob that there is no bug. Its how you parse the English that
> mat
Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> 2009/5/5 Bob Penfield :
>> If there are no binding remaining, the 200 OK does not need to have a
>> Contact header. A 200-OK response without any Contacts indicates that there
>> are no bindings.
>
> Please Bob, read the *oficially* reported bug about this subject w
2009/5/5 Bob Penfield :
> If there are no binding remaining, the 200 OK does not need to have a Contact
> header. A 200-OK response without any Contacts indicates that there are no
> bindings.
Please Bob, read the *oficially* reported bug about this subject which
had a long discussion some time
...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of
javier.ferreirogar...@telefonica.es
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 8:08 AM
To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: javier.ferreirogar...@telefonica.es; mariadelcarmen.ortizf...@telefonica.es
Subject: [Sip-implementors] Doubt on inclussion of Contact header in 200 OK to
2009/5/5 Iñaki Baz Castillo :
> 2009/4/7 :
>> Hi
>> A user agent registers against a REGISTRAR; so a 200 OK response is
>> generated and includes a Contact header with the binding included in the
>> request.
>> No more bindings are stores in the registrar for this sip user.
>> The user agent start
2009/4/7 :
> Hi
> A user agent registers against a REGISTRAR; so a 200 OK response is
> generated and includes a Contact header with the binding included in the
> request.
> No more bindings are stores in the registrar for this sip user.
> The user agent starts a deregistration procedure (i.e. REG
Hi
A user agent registers against a REGISTRAR; so a 200 OK response is
generated and includes a Contact header with the binding included in the
request.
No more bindings are stores in the registrar for this sip user.
The user agent starts a deregistration procedure (i.e. REGISTER with
Expires=0)
10 matches
Mail list logo
