Re: [Sip-implementors] Expected UAC behavior when a reliable/non-reliable 18x without SDP is recieved for an INVITE sent without an offer and require 100 rel

2012-01-20 Thread Sairam POKKUNURI
eenath > > > > > From: "Kumar, Hemanth" > To: "sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu" < > sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu> > Cc: Paul Kyzivat > Sent: Friday, 6 January 2012 1:52 PM > Subject: Re: [Si

Re: [Sip-implementors] Expected UAC behavior when a reliable/non-reliable 18x without SDP is recieved for an INVITE sent without an offer and require 100 rel

2012-01-20 Thread Sreenath Kulkarni
nt: Friday, 6 January 2012 1:52 PM Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Expected UAC behavior when a reliable/non-reliable 18x without SDP is recieved for an INVITE sent without an offer and require 100 rel Hi All, This is a B2BUA scenario. This issue is as shown below   UE1 - INVITE [no SDP, Req

Re: [Sip-implementors] Expected UAC behavior when a reliable/non-reliable 18x without SDP is recieved for an INVITE sent without an offer and require 100 rel

2012-01-06 Thread Paul Kyzivat
UE2 is operating in a non-conforming manner. In this (and most) cases, the behavior when dealing with a non-conforming message is not defined. Its up to you to decide what you want to do. You can experiment with what works best for you. There is no guarantee that anything you do will work *well

Re: [Sip-implementors] Expected UAC behavior when a reliable/non-reliable 18x without SDP is recieved for an INVITE sent without an offer and require 100 rel

2012-01-06 Thread Kumar, Hemanth
Hi All, This is a B2BUA scenario. This issue is as shown below UE1 - INVITE [no SDP, Require:100 Rel] > B2BUA --- INVITE [no SDP, Require:100 Rel] ---> UE2 B2BUA <--- 183 [no SDP] - UE2 Wh