Arun Arora writes:
> My only worry was for backwards compatibility.
RFC 3261 is already 13 years old, so there shouldn't be much equipment
in use that only implements RFC 2543.
Dale
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.e
= ALPHA *( ALPHA / DIGIT / "+" / "-" / "." )
>> >
>> >COLON = SWS ":" SWS ; colon
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >> -Original Message-
>> >> From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [
I= scheme ":" ( hier-part / opaque-part )
> >
> >scheme = ALPHA *( ALPHA / DIGIT / "+" / "-" / "." )
> >
> >COLON = SWS ":" SWS ; colon
> >
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
>
colon
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mailto:sip-
>> implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Arun Arora
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2015 5:52 AM
>> To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columb
N = SWS ":" SWS ; colon
> -Original Message-
> From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mailto:sip-
> implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Arun Arora
> Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2015 5:52 AM
> To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.col
I am working on a SIP parser while reading RFC3261. I wonder is it OK to put
WHITESPACE between SIP and COLON in a SIP URI, for e.g.
“BOB"
Is this syntactically correct.
Thanks,
Arun
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.colum
