Praveen,
I think based on that text, if proxy is overwriting originally inserted R-R, it
will need to be consistent and do it for both first 2xx and re-transmitted 2xx.
Since you basic question is whether first 2xx can have different R-R from the
retransmitted 2xx, based on my experience, the answe
Nebojsa Miljanovic wrote:
> Since 200 OK responses must follow the Vias listed in INVITE, they
> cannot be
> retransmitted over different proxies.
This isn't entirely true. See RFC3261 Section 18.2.2 for details (and
follow the reference to [4] which is RFC3263).
In brief, under certain specific
Thanks for your inputs Nebojsa and Vikram. I understand that the retransmitted
2xx has to follow the same path as the first 2xx. Now I have a doubt that
whether an intermediate proxy can change the record-route to indicate that it
will be available at some different URI in future before forwardi
Since 200 OK responses must follow the Vias listed in INVITE, they cannot be
retransmitted over different proxies.
On 10/17/2007 2:12 AM, praveen dandin wrote:
> Hi,
> Consider the following scenario ( proxies between UAC and UAS are not shown)
> UAC
Please see inline.
On 10/17/07, praveen dandin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> Consider the following scenario ( proxies between UAC and UAS are not shown)
> UAC UAS
>INVITE
> |--
Hi,
Consider the following scenario ( proxies between UAC and UAS are not shown)
UAC UAS
INVITE
|>|
180
|<--
