Mayank Gupta wrote:
> Hi Ritul
>
> Is there any significance of this additional message for INVITE?
>
> ACK for initial INVITE request makes sense as it may be useful for
> offer-answer when initial INVITE is without SDP and offer is received from
> called party in 200 OK. In that case ACK wil
You can have Re-Invite without SDP also for 3PCC implementations.
Thanks & Regards,
Raju
- Original Message -
From: "Mayank Gupta"
To: "Ritul Sonania"
Cc:
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 3:46 PM
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] New offer answer using ReInvite
Hi Ritul
Is there any significance of this additional message for INVITE?
ACK for initial INVITE request makes sense as it may be useful for
offer-answer when initial INVITE is without SDP and offer is received from
called party in 200 OK. In that case ACK will send the answer.
But what is the
Hi,
ACK is for INVITE Transactions only.
Thanks,
Vijay S Nair.
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Mayank Gupta wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I have a query regarding new offer-answer using Re-invite and Update
> methods.
>
> When a new offer is sent using a Re-invite, it is responded by 200 OK and
> then A
>
> Hi All
>
> I have a query regarding new offer-answer using Re-invite and Update
> methods.
>
> When a new offer is sent using a Re-invite, it is responded by 200 OK and
> then ACK for this 200 OK is sent.
>
> >Re-Invite (for new offer)
> <--- 200
Hi All
I have a query regarding new offer-answer using Re-invite and Update
methods.
When a new offer is sent using a Re-invite, it is responded by 200 OK and
then ACK for this 200 OK is sent.
>Re-Invite (for new offer)
<--- 200 OK
