Thanks everyone for the help. I shared the below communication and
excerpt from the RFC and we have raised a ticket to change the settings
on the third party side to not change the media port in the 200 OK once
it has been sent in the 180.
Probably they would stop sending sdp in the 180 ringing m
> Is the session Id AND Session Version changed for 183
> and 200ok ? If yes then the the sdp to be used is the
> latest one (and the solution to have ringing back tone
> on 183 is very old).
The SIP offer/answer rules override the latest version of the session ID rules.
Message-
From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu
[mailto:sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of ext
Paul Kyzivat
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 5:25 PM
To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Query Regarding Media port change
I agree with Dale and Brett, sort of.
Brett is right that the UAC is correct in ignoring the change in the
200. Dale is right that the UAS is wrong in sending different SDP in the
180 and 200.
See http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-sipping-sip-offeranswer-13.txt
Thanks,
Paul
On
From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu
[sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of
bijoy.prak...@wipro.com [bijoy.prak...@wipro.com]
What I want to confirm is that if this behaviour from the 3rd party is
proper that is chan
> <
> 180 Ringing (SDP sent with media port set as )
>
> <
> 200 OK (SDP sent with media port set as )
>
>
> Our SIP implementation does not accept the port change
> and there is no call path b
On 02/10/2011 10:42 AM, Saúl Ibarra Corretgé wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 1:37 PM, wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have this specific scenario and would like to know if its proper.
>>
>> We have a SIP Phone connected to our end which calls a third party SIP
>> phone.
>>
>> The scenario is someth
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 1:37 PM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have this specific scenario and would like to know if its proper.
>
> We have a SIP Phone connected to our end which calls a third party SIP
> phone.
>
> The scenario is something like this:
>
> Our Phone 3rd Party
>
On 02/10/2011 06:37 AM, bijoy.prak...@wipro.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have this specific scenario and would like to know if its proper.
>
> We have a SIP Phone connected to our end which calls a third party SIP
> phone.
>
> The scenario is something like this:
>
> Our Phone3rd
Hi,
I have this specific scenario and would like to know if its proper.
We have a SIP Phone connected to our end which calls a third party SIP
phone.
The scenario is something like this:
Our Phone3rd Party
->
10 matches
Mail list logo
