Re: [Sip-implementors] Query for refresher value in 200 OK of INVITE

2016-03-11 Thread Brett Tate
Hi, > UAC (Caller) UAS(Callee) As an fyi, the UAC/UAS labels within the figure are not accurate since requests are sent is both directions. User Agent Client and User Agent Server are defined within RFC 3261 section 6. > 1. Can the refresher value be changed in the SE header > of the

Re: [Sip-implementors] Query for refresher value in 200 OK of INVITE

2016-03-10 Thread Mayank Sharma
>> I think a UAS is forbidden to include a Session-Expires header field >> in the UPDATE request and a UAC should reject it. >> In that case, the value of session refresher in 200 OK of INVITE MUST >> be uac. > > I'm not sure why you think that it is forbidden. > > RFC 4024 table 1 shows tha

Re: [Sip-implementors] Query for refresher value in 200 OK of INVITE

2016-03-10 Thread Paul Kyzivat
On 3/10/16 6:52 AM, Brett Tate wrote: I think a UAS is forbidden to include a Session-Expires header field in the UPDATE request and a UAC should reject it. In that case, the value of session refresher in 200 OK of INVITE MUST be uac. I'm not sure why you think that it is forbidden. RFC 4024 t

Re: [Sip-implementors] Query for refresher value in 200 OK of INVITE

2016-03-10 Thread ankur bansal
yeah agree with Brett .It should not be forbidden rather should be replied with SE and refresher parameter. I think user A should have sent refresher role as UAS instead of UAC in 200ok of UPDATE to clearly say User A is acting as refresher as how he intended to be refresher in INVITE by putting U

Re: [Sip-implementors] Query for refresher value in 200 OK of INVITE

2016-03-10 Thread Brett Tate
> I think a UAS is forbidden to include a Session-Expires header field in > the > UPDATE request and a UAC should reject it. > In that case, the value of session refresher in 200 OK of INVITE MUST be > uac. I'm not sure why you think that it is forbidden. RFC 4024 table 1 shows that Session-Expir

Re: [Sip-implementors] Query for refresher value in 200 OK of INVITE

2016-03-10 Thread ietf . shinji
Hi, I think a UAS is forbidden to include a Session-Expires header field in the UPDATE request and a UAC should reject it. In that case, the value of session refresher in 200 OK of INVITE MUST be uac. Regards, Shinji >Hello, > >I have some queries in the below scenario : > UAC

Re: [Sip-implementors] : Query for refresher value in 200 OK of INVITE

2016-03-09 Thread Brett Tate
> <---UPDATE > > (Session-Expires:3600;refresher=none) The header is malformed. The valid refresher values are indicated within RFC 4028 section 4. > [Query]: What should be the value of session refresher in 200 OK of INVITE? The refresher should be "u

[Sip-implementors] : Query for refresher value in 200 OK of INVITE

2016-03-09 Thread Mayank Sharma
Hello, I have some queries in the below scenario : UAC UAS --- INVITE --> (Session-Expires:3600;refresher=uac) <183 Session Progress -PRACK ---