Brett Tate wrote:
>>> I have some odd test scenario where initial call establishment
>> happens with
>>> recv only / sendony. After the establishment of the call caller
>> reinvites
>>> with "0.0.0.0" and direction attribute recvonly. I understand that
>> this is a
>>> invalid case, but would
> > I have some odd test scenario where initial call establishment
> happens with
> > recv only / sendony. After the establishment of the call caller
> reinvites
> > with "0.0.0.0" and direction attribute recvonly. I understand that
> this is a
> > invalid case, but would like to get comments in
Suresh Arunachalam wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I have some odd test scenario where initial call establishment happens with
> recv only / sendony. After the establishment of the call caller reinvites
> with "0.0.0.0" and direction attribute recvonly. I understand that this is a
> invalid case, but
s.columbia.edu [mailto:sip-
> implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Suresh
> Arunachalam
> Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 9:42 PM
> To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> Subject: [Sip-implementors] Question regarding offer-answer handling
>
> Hello All,
&
Hello All,
I have some odd test scenario where initial call establishment happens with
recv only / sendony. After the establishment of the call caller reinvites
with "0.0.0.0" and direction attribute recvonly. I understand that this is a
invalid case, but would like to get comments in this case
