Hi,
RFC 3261 section 7.3.1 presents the following common header format.
field-name: field-value *(;parameter-name=parameter-value)
Does RFC 3261 or another RFC indicate if the order of the parameters
defaults to being significant or insignificant?
RFC 3261 section 19.1.4 indicates the
Brett,
I'm not aware of anywhere that *says* anything about the
(in)significance of the order.
IMO, based on the overall philosophy of 3261 I would say that the
ordering must be insignificant.
Thanks,
Paul
On 8/28/15 1:36 PM, Brett Tate wrote:
Hi,
RFC 3261 section 7.3.1
