Re: [Sip-implementors] RTP flow's route follows SIP flow's route ...

a T: 519.786.1241 > > -Original Message- > From: Paul Kyzivat [mailto:pkyzi...@alum.mit.edu] > Sent: July-18-13 11:11 AM > To: ikuzar RABE > Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu > Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] RTP flow's route follows SIP flow's route ...

Re: [Sip-implementors] RTP flow's route follows SIP flow's route ...

@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] RTP flow's route follows SIP flow's route ... Wow, thanks for sharing. I honestly didn't know about that one! Joel Gerber Network Specialist Network Operations Eastlink E: joel.ger...@corp.eastlink.ca T: 519.786.1241 -Original Me

Re: [Sip-implementors] RTP flow's route follows SIP flow's route ...

erber Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] RTP flow's route follows SIP flow's route ... There kinda sorta is one, in RFC 5853: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5853 Obviously it's not complete/comprehensive, though. But yeah basically "SBC&qu

Re: [Sip-implementors] RTP flow's route follows SIP flow's route ...

There kinda sorta is one, in RFC 5853: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5853 Obviously it's not complete/comprehensive, though. But yeah basically "SBC" is an industry market term, and it's muddy... not a formal definition like RFC 3261 "Proxy". -hadriel On Jul 18, 2013, at 11:22 AM, Joel Gerber

Re: [Sip-implementors] RTP flow's route follows SIP flow's route ...

cs.columbia.edu Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] RTP flow's route follows SIP flow's route ... Then stop calling it a *proxy*! It is an SBC. Thanks, Paul On 7/18/13 6:28 AM, ikuzar RABE wrote: > Ok thanks for your responses, > There is indeed an RTP proxy within t

Re: [Sip-implementors] RTP flow's route follows SIP flow's route ...

Then stop calling it a *proxy*! It is an SBC. Thanks, Paul On 7/18/13 6:28 AM, ikuzar RABE wrote: > Ok thanks for your responses, > There is indeed an RTP proxy within the sip proxy... and it works as you > described above. > > > 2013/7/17 Paul Kyzivat

Re: [Sip-implementors] RTP flow's route follows SIP flow's route ...

Ok thanks for your responses, There is indeed an RTP proxy within the sip proxy... and it works as you described above. 2013/7/17 Paul Kyzivat > As others have noted, for this to happen the "proxy" (proxies?) needs to > modify the SDP to cause this to happen. If it does this it has violated > t

Re: [Sip-implementors] RTP flow's route follows SIP flow's route ...

As others have noted, for this to happen the "proxy" (proxies?) needs to modify the SDP to cause this to happen. If it does this it has violated the rules for a proxy. Devices that do this are typically called Session Border Controllers. It is very common. There are both advantages and disadvan

Re: [Sip-implementors] RTP flow's route follows SIP flow's route ...

ject: [Sip-implementors] RTP flow's route follows SIP flow's route ... Hi all, I saw a RTP flow which is not directly established between UAC and UAS but goes through a SIP proxy ... Is there any information in SIP message exchange producing this situation ? Thanks fo

Re: [Sip-implementors] RTP flow's route follows SIP flow's route ...

17 Luglio 2013 11:29 Oggetto: [Sip-implementors] RTP flow's route follows SIP flow's route ... Hi all, I saw a RTP flow which is not directly established between UAC and UAS but goes through a SIP proxy ... Is there any information in SIP message exchange producing this situation ?

[Sip-implementors] RTP flow's route follows SIP flow's route ...

Hi all, I saw a RTP flow which is not directly established between UAC and UAS but goes through a SIP proxy ... Is there any information in SIP message exchange producing this situation ? Thanks for your help, ikuzar ___ Sip-implementors mailing list