Re: [Sip-implementors] Record Route header processing for unreliable 18x response at UAC end

2011-09-09 Thread Vivek Talwar
Abhishek Sahu Sent: Friday, September 09, 2011 12:26 PM To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: [Sip-implementors] Record Route header processing for unreliable 18x response at UAC end Hello All I've one query regarding behavior of Record-Route. If Record-Route is present in SIP unrel

Re: [Sip-implementors] Record Route header processing for unreliable 18x response at UAC end

2011-09-09 Thread Paul Kyzivat
On 9/9/11 2:56 AM, Abhishek Sahu wrote: > Hello All > > I've one query regarding behavior of Record-Route. If Record-Route is present > in SIP unreliable 18x response and UPDATE needs to be sent prior to receiving > of 2xx response. So should the Route header for the UPDATE request be updated >

Re: [Sip-implementors] Record Route header processing for unreliable 18x response at UAC end

2011-09-09 Thread Shanbhag, Somesh (NSN - IN/Bangalore)
entors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: [Sip-implementors] Record Route header processing for unreliable 18x response at UAC end Hello All I've one query regarding behavior of Record-Route. If Record-Route is present in SIP unreliable 18x response and UPDATE needs to be sent prior to receiving of 2xx r

[Sip-implementors] Record Route header processing for unreliable 18x response at UAC end

2011-09-08 Thread Abhishek Sahu
Hello All I've one query regarding behavior of Record-Route. If Record-Route is present in SIP unreliable 18x response and UPDATE needs to be sent prior to receiving of 2xx response. So should the Route header for the UPDATE request be updated according to the Record-Route of 18x response? In