Re: [Sip-implementors] Response to Unsupported Event in SUBSCRIBE

2009-04-06 Thread Dale Worley
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 16:12 +0530, ROHIT CHAUDHARY wrote: > Wondering what should be the appropriate response to a SUBSCRIBE > received with a recognized but unsupported Event. As far as I can see, > the RFC talks of only responding with 489 to unrecognized events. 404 would also be reasonable --

Re: [Sip-implementors] Response to Unsupported Event in SUBSCRIBE

2009-04-02 Thread Vivek Batra
:52 +0100 From: "Attila Sipos" Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Response to Unsupported Event in SUBSCRIBE To: "Avasarala Ranjit-A20990" , I?aki Baz Castillo Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Message-ID: <680808427cf931459462c3d78cb5ec60053

Re: [Sip-implementors] Response to Unsupported Event in SUBSCRIBE

2009-04-02 Thread Brett Tate
sts.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Iñaki Baz > Castillo > Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 8:41 AM > To: Avasarala Ranjit-A20990 > Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu > Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Response to Unsupported Event in SUBSCRIBE > > 2009/4/2 Avasarala Ranjit-A2

Re: [Sip-implementors] Response to Unsupported Event in SUBSCRIBE

2009-04-02 Thread Iñaki Baz Castillo
2009/4/2 Avasarala Ranjit-A20990 : > No there could be a case like u support the event - so u recognize it. But u > do not want to accept the subscriptions for it. So u send 403. For me 403 means that "I support it but not for you". -- Iñaki Baz Castillo _

Re: [Sip-implementors] Response to Unsupported Event in SUBSCRIBE

2009-04-02 Thread Attila Sipos
April 2009 11:55 To: Iñaki Baz Castillo Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Response to Unsupported Event in SUBSCRIBE No there could be a case like u support the event - so u recognize it. But u do not want to accept the subscriptions for it. So u send 403

Re: [Sip-implementors] Response to Unsupported Event in SUBSCRIBE

2009-04-02 Thread Avasarala Ranjit-A20990
] On Behalf Of Iñaki Baz Castillo Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 4:23 PM Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Response to Unsupported Event in SUBSCRIBE 2009/4/2 Avasarala Ranjit-A20990 : > As per RFC 3265, if u recognize an Event, u support it. But if

Re: [Sip-implementors] Response to Unsupported Event in SUBSCRIBE

2009-04-02 Thread Iñaki Baz Castillo
2009/4/2 Avasarala Ranjit-A20990 : > As per RFC 3265, if u recognize an Event, u support it. But if an event > is recognized and not supported, 403 Forbidden may be appropriate I don't see the difference between "recognized" and "not supported". For me it means the same. If a UAS doesn't support a

Re: [Sip-implementors] Response to Unsupported Event in SUBSCRIBE

2009-04-02 Thread Avasarala Ranjit-A20990
Behalf Of ROHIT CHAUDHARY Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 4:13 PM To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: [Sip-implementors] Response to Unsupported Event in SUBSCRIBE Hi all, Wondering what should be the appropriate response to a SUBSCRIBE received with a recognized but unsupported Event

[Sip-implementors] Response to Unsupported Event in SUBSCRIBE

2009-04-02 Thread ROHIT CHAUDHARY
Hi all, Wondering what should be the appropriate response to a SUBSCRIBE received with a recognized but unsupported Event. As far as I can see, the RFC talks of only responding with 489 to unrecognized events. Any thoughts? Regards, Rohit Add more friends to your messenger and enj