On 12/21/11 3:09 AM, Saul Ibarra Corretge wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Dec 21, 2011, at 8:00 AM, William Scott wrote:
>
>> On 21 December 2011 17:10, Alex Balashov wrote:
>>> Is your concern about the two RR headers, or the double lr parameter?
>>
>> The double lr parameter.
>>
>> When my ATA sends the dou
Hi,
On Dec 21, 2011, at 8:00 AM, William Scott wrote:
> On 21 December 2011 17:10, Alex Balashov wrote:
>> Is your concern about the two RR headers, or the double lr parameter?
>
> The double lr parameter.
>
> When my ATA sends the double lr to a VSP using Asterisk the call continues.
>
> Whe
On 21 December 2011 17:14, Tarun2 Gupta wrote:
> Refer RFC 3261, Section 7.3.1
>
> Each of the following blocks is valid but not equivalent to the
> others:
>
> Route:
> Route:
> Route:
>
> Route:
> Route:
> Route:
>
> Route: ,,
>
>
> ..
>
On 21 December 2011 17:10, Alex Balashov wrote:
> Is your concern about the two RR headers, or the double lr parameter?
The double lr parameter.
When my ATA sends the double lr to a VSP using Asterisk the call continues.
When it sends it to a VSP using "Sippy" (as seen in User-Agent: and
Server
ssage-
From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu
[mailto:sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of William
Scott
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 11:34 AM
To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: [Sip-implementors] Route-Record
Hi,
I have a ATA that pro
Is your concern about the two RR headers, or the double lr parameter?
--
This message was painstakingly thumbed out on my mobile, so apologies for
brevity, errors, and general sloppiness.
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
260 Peachtree Street NW
Suite 2200
Atlanta, GA 30303
Tel: +1
Hi,
I have a ATA that produces...
Record-Route:
Record-Route:
in the 200 OK reply to an INVITE.
Good, bad or doesn't matter?
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/s
