olumbia.edu
> [mailto:sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu]
> On Behalf Of
> java jalwa
> Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 8:22 PM
> To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> Subject: [Sip-implementors] SIP REGISTER wi
ntors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu]
> > On Behalf Of
> > java jalwa
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 8:22 PM
> > To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> > Subject: [Sip-implementors] SIP REGISTER without expiration
> > of
> > previousREGISTER
> >
sday, May 20, 2009 8:22 PM
> To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> Subject: [Sip-implementors] SIP REGISTER without expiration
> of
> previousREGISTER
>
> Hello All,
> I am trying to interpret
> section 10.3 of RFC 3261 which deals
> with processing of i
: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 8:22 PM
To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: [Sip-implementors] SIP REGISTER without expiration of
previousREGISTER
Hello All,
I am trying to interpret section 10.3 of RFC 3261 which deals
with processing of incoming REGISTER requests.
Pardon my
