Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP headers size

2011-03-14 Thread Worley, Dale R (Dale)
From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of José Luis Hernández Ramos [joseluis...@gmail.com] Hi all, and thanks in advance. I want to extend the SIP functionality. So, is it preferabl

Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP headers size

2011-03-13 Thread Brett Tate
> I want to extend the SIP functionality. The following RFCs may be of interest: rfc4485 and rfc5621. > So, is it preferable to introduce into the body or as a new header? It depends. > Is there a maximum size for a header? No; however if you are introducing large headers/bodies, you should

Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP headers size

2011-03-13 Thread Iñaki Baz Castillo
El día 12 de marzo de 2011 11:01, SIP Satan escribió: > Its always better add a mime body, possibly xml. Even multi-line data can go > in such message body. *Why* XML? -- Iñaki Baz Castillo ___ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs

Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP headers size

2011-03-12 Thread SIP Satan
Its always better add a mime body, possibly xml. Even multi-line data can go in such message body. 2011/3/12 José Luis Hernández Ramos > Hi all, and thanks in advance. I want to extend the SIP functionality. So, > is > it preferable to introduce into the body or as a new header? Is there a > ma

[Sip-implementors] SIP headers size

2011-03-12 Thread José Luis Hernández Ramos
Hi all, and thanks in advance. I want to extend the SIP functionality. So, is it preferable to introduce into the body or as a new header? Is there a maximum size for a header? Thank you very much. ___ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists