Re: [Sip-implementors] Sending deRegister request just after sending REGISTER request

2017-06-29 Thread Brett Tate
> I haven't dug through the specifications. But if they have the > same Call-ID, then the CSeq tells the order the REGISTERs are > to have effect. If the network reorders them, the de-REGISTER > will prevail because it has a higher CSeq. My current understanding is that it depends upon

Re: [Sip-implementors] Sending deRegister request just after sending REGISTER request

2017-06-28 Thread Dale R. Worley
Paul Kyzivat writes: > Another consideration is whether these are done using the same Call-ID. > (In the same pseudo-dialog.) I don't think it will generally make any > difference, but it may present issues if you are also requesting a > temporary gruu with the

Re: [Sip-implementors] Sending deRegister request just after sending REGISTER request

2017-06-28 Thread Paul Kyzivat
On 6/28/17 1:11 AM, Parveen Aggarwal wrote: Dear Expert, Is it valid to send deRegister request i.e. REGISTER with expires=0 before receiving final response for previous registration request i.e. REGISTER with expires >0 ? As per RFC 3261, It is mentioned for new REGISTER request only UAs

Re: [Sip-implementors] Sending deRegister request just after sending REGISTER request

2017-06-28 Thread Banda, Srinivas (Srinivas)
) Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Sending deRegister request just after sending REGISTER request Thanks Srinivas for reply. Is there any specification which restricts to send REGISTER with expires=0 before receiving final response of REGISTER with expires

Re: [Sip-implementors] Sending deRegister request just after sending REGISTER request

2017-06-27 Thread Parveen Aggarwal
dnesday, June 28, 2017 10:41 AM > To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu > Subject: [Sip-implementors] Sending deRegister request just after sending > REGISTER request > > Dear Expert, > > Is it valid to send deRegister request i.e. REGISTER with expires=0 before > receiving fi

Re: [Sip-implementors] Sending deRegister request just after sending REGISTER request

2017-06-27 Thread Banda, Srinivas (Srinivas)
oun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mailto:sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Parveen Aggarwal Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 10:41 AM To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: [Sip-implementors] Sending deRegister request just after sending REGISTER request Dear Exp

[Sip-implementors] Sending deRegister request just after sending REGISTER request

2017-06-27 Thread Parveen Aggarwal
Dear Expert, Is it valid to send deRegister request i.e. REGISTER with expires=0 before receiving final response for previous registration request i.e. REGISTER with expires >0 ? As per RFC 3261, It is mentioned for new REGISTER request only UAs MUST NOT send a new registration (that is,