e
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>> Varun
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Brett Tate wrote:
>>>
>>> RFC 5626 will likely be helpful.
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>&
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Brett Tate wrote:
>>
>> RFC 5626 will likely be helpful.
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mailto:sip-
>>>> implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu]
.
-Original Message-
From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mailto:sip-
implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of VARUN BHATIA
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 6:52 AM
To: sip-implementors
Subject: [Sip-implementors] TCP/NAT handling in SIP
Hi,
If the UA is
-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mailto:sip-
> > implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of VARUN BHATIA
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 6:52 AM
> > To: sip-implementors
> > Subject: [Sip-implementors] TCP/NAT handling in SIP
> >
> > Hi
[Sip-implementors] TCP/NAT handling in SIP
>
> Hi,
>
> If the UA is behind NAT registers on TCP and after that it initiates a
> call
> on same connection (may be another connection ?) after some time
> connection
> break now as soon as UA detect that the connection is closed
Hi,
If the UA is behind NAT registers on TCP and after that it initiates a call
on same connection (may be another connection ?) after some time connection
break now as soon as UA detect that the connection is closed it initiates a
new REGISTER using new connection (It is not changing contact as i
