Re: [Sip-implementors] Terminating early dialog with BYE. - Email found in subject

2013-10-08 Thread Johan DE CLERCQ
nvite is in the chain. Cheers, Johan. From: Jan Bollen [mailto:jan.bol...@scarlet.be] Sent: dinsdag 8 oktober 2013 9:15 To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Terminating early dialog with BYE. - Email found in subject Hello, The question is: where is the &qu

Re: [Sip-implementors] Terminating early dialog with BYE.

2013-10-08 Thread ankur bansal
Hi Jan , First of all let me clarify diff between CANCEL and BYE ,then we will be in better position to understand what to use when .. As you know multiple early dialogs might be present due to forking 1. BYE is sent to terminate a specific dialog(early or confirmed) as to-tag present in BYE

Re: [Sip-implementors] Terminating early dialog with BYE.

2013-10-08 Thread Jan Bollen
Hello,  The question is: where is the "pending" request in the presented scenario with the BYE sent in a early dialogue. The same RFC also states: "The notion of "hanging up" is not well defined within SIP.  It is   specific to a partic

Re: [Sip-implementors] Terminating early dialog with BYE.

2013-10-07 Thread Preksha Gupta
Hi Pravin It is recommended for UAS to send 487 for pending requests in such scenarios. Refer Section 15.1.2 of RFC 3261: " The UAS MUST still respond to any pending requests received for that dialog. It is RECOMMENDED that a 487 (Request Terminated) response be generated to those pending request

[Sip-implementors] Terminating early dialog with BYE.

2013-10-07 Thread Pravin Kumar
According to RFC 3261: Early Dialog can be terminate sending by BYE or CANCEL for UAC side. In case of CANCEL we should send 487 for INVITE UAC UAS -INVITE-> < -180-- --CANCEL--- > < -200