Re: [Sip-implementors] To tag in 407 challenges

On 3/25/18 7:06 PM, Alex Balashov wrote: My perplexion is rooted precisely in the fact that no dialog has been established upon a negative final reply to the invite transaction. While I agree that logically the to-tag is in some cases unnecessary in cases like this, the fact is that 3261

Re: [Sip-implementors] To tag in 407 challenges

My perplexion is rooted precisely in the fact that no dialog has been established upon a negative final reply to the invite transaction. On March 25, 2018 6:27:03 PM EDT, Paul Kyzivat wrote: >On 3/25/18 5:26 PM, Alex Balashov wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Are 407 challenges meant

Re: [Sip-implementors] To tag in 407 challenges

On 3/25/18 5:26 PM, Alex Balashov wrote: Hi, Are 407 challenges meant to have a To tag? If so, I can't find the rationale in 3261. Any pointers would be appreciated. (working from memory) An argument against to-tag in 407 would presumably apply equally to any 3xx, 4xx, 5xx, or 6xx. One

[Sip-implementors] To tag in 407 challenges

Hi, Are 407 challenges meant to have a To tag? If so, I can't find the rationale in 3261. Any pointers would be appreciated. -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/