On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Robert Sparks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You are correct.
>
> I think 3311 was talking about "early" vs "confirmed" when it said "state
> of the dialog", but clearly the text
> could be improved to avoid conflation with "dialog state" (meaning call-id,
> cseqs, ta
You are correct.
I think 3311 was talking about "early" vs "confirmed" when it said
"state of the dialog", but clearly the text
could be improved to avoid conflation with "dialog state" (meaning
call-id, cseqs, targets, routeset, etc.)
I'll capture this as a bug for future clarification. I
UPDATE RFC3311 mentions it does not affect dialog state (eg in Abstract:
"has no impact on the state of a dialog"). But the RFC later mentions
that UPDATE can update remote target (eg quote: "UPDATE is a target
refresh request. As specified in RFC 3261 [1], this means that it can
update the remote
UPDATE RFC3311 mentions it does not affect dialog state (eg in Abstract:
"has no impact on the state of a dialog"). But the RFC later mentions
that UPDATE can update remote target (eg quote: "UPDATE is a target
refresh request. As specified in RFC 3261 [1], this means that it can
update the remote
