le Worley
>> Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
>> Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Weird SDP
>>
>> Dale Worley wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 10:21 -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
>>>> We have come over to a device that generates "strange" SDP. Basically,
gt; Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Weird SDP
>
> Dale Worley wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 10:21 -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> >> We have come over to a device that generates "strange" SDP. Basically,
> >> it splits the same media description into two sepa
On Fri, 2009-01-09 at 12:19 -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> > I is *allowed*, but as you think, it means that there are two separate
> > media streams (both of which are to be sent to port 5010. If the UA
> > that is generating the SDP does not intend to specify two separate media
> > streams, the U
Dale Worley wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 10:21 -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
>> We have come over to a device that generates "strange" SDP. Basically,
>> it splits the same media description into two separate media section. As
>> a result our software considers it as two separate streams, not as
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 10:21 -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> We have come over to a device that generates "strange" SDP. Basically,
> it splits the same media description into two separate media section. As
> a result our software considers it as two separate streams, not as one
> which it apparent
Hi,
We have come over to a device that generates "strange" SDP. Basically,
it splits the same media description into two separate media section. As
a result our software considers it as two separate streams, not as one
which it apparently is.
To me, it seems like the format is invalid, however
